PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EES vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EES vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund (EES) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EES achieves a 19.30% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, EES has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 11.05%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.


EES

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.09%
6M
14.07%
YTD
19.30%
1Y
35.49%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
11.05%
ALL TIME*
8.88%

DGRW

1D
0.49%
1M
0.69%
6M
6.01%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
13.71%
ALL TIME*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.03M$48.50M$56.54M
$647.35K$769.12K$909.42K

EES vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund
19.30%6.99%9.86%18.53%-16.18%34.39%3.06%21.68%-10.12%12.42%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
8.57%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EES and DGRW is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.75

The correlation between EES and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

EES vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EES
DGRW

Financial Services

22.4%
8.4%

Technology

15.6%
33.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
8.0%

Industrials

12.9%
11.8%

Healthcare

10.1%
12.8%

Energy

6.3%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
6.7%

Real Estate

4.7%

-

Basic Materials

4.7%
2.8%

Communication Services

3.5%
11.1%

Utilities

1.6%
0.2%

Financial Services

EES
22.4%
DGRW
8.4%

Technology

EES
15.6%
DGRW
33.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EES
13.3%
DGRW
8.0%

Industrials

EES
12.9%
DGRW
11.8%

Healthcare

EES
10.1%
DGRW
12.8%

Energy

EES
6.3%
DGRW
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

EES
4.8%
DGRW
6.7%

Real Estate

EES
4.7%
DGRW

-

Basic Materials

EES
4.7%
DGRW
2.8%

Communication Services

EES
3.5%
DGRW
11.1%

Utilities

EES
1.6%
DGRW
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EES vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EES
EES Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EES Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EES Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EES vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund (EES) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EESDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

1.79

+2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.80

7.25

+5.55

EES vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EES Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EES and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EES vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EES drawdown since its inception was -63.66%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EES and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EESDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.66%

-32.04%

-31.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.98%

-8.30%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.15%

-16.21%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.15%

-17.27%

-9.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.52%

-32.04%

-18.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-1.31%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-3.00%

-7.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.05%

+0.51%

Volatility

EES vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund (EES) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.92%. This indicates that EES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EESDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

2.92%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

8.33%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

10.44%

+6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

14.01%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

16.18%

+7.53%

EES vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

EES vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

EES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than DGRW's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
EES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund
1.14%1.29%1.37%1.18%1.12%1.69%1.29%1.31%1.81%0.93%1.02%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


EES and DGRW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EES has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to DGRW (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EES dropped -63.66% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 13.71% vs 11.05% for EES. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 13.71% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for EES.

DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.14% for EES.

EES is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DGRW is Quality Factor. EES tracks WisdomTree U.S. Small Cap Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EES and 0.28% for DGRW.

EES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EES and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer