EEMX vs. QQQ
EEMX (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEMX returned 7.82%/yr vs 17.86%/yr for QQQ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
EEMX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMX achieves a 27.49% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 20.71% return.
EEMX
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 27.49%
- 6M
- 30.63%
- 1Y
- 54.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 40.74%
- 3Y*
- 28.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.86%
- 10Y*
- 21.84%
EEMX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 27.49% | 35.23% | 7.22% | 9.80% | -19.75% | -3.57% | 19.55% | 18.56% | -16.76% | 38.46% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMX and QQQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2016 | 0.60 |
The correlation between EEMX and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EEMX vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMX
QQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Technology
EEMX
QQQ
Financial Services
EEMX
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
EEMX
QQQ
Industrials
EEMX
QQQ
Communication Services
EEMX
QQQ
Basic Materials
EEMX
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
EEMX
QQQ
Healthcare
EEMX
QQQ
Utilities
EEMX
QQQ
Real Estate
EEMX
QQQ
Energy
EEMX
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EEMX
QQQ
EEMX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEMX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.44 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 3.42 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.59 | 13.14 | +2.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEMX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.57 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.80 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.41 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
EEMX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMX and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.90% | -82.97% | +43.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -11.96% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -22.77% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.08% | -35.12% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -0.74% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -32.78% | +18.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.11% | +0.40% |
Volatility
EEMX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.51%. This indicates that EEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.86% | 4.51% | +4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 12.10% | +6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.78% | 15.94% | +4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 22.37% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 22.29% | -2.07% |
EEMX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
EEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 1.77% | 2.28% | 2.26% | 2.20% | 2.38% | 1.72% | 1.42% | 2.57% | 2.41% | 2.45% | 0.15% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMX and QQQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMX has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to QQQ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMX dropped -39.90% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.86% vs 7.82% for EEMX. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EEMX.
EEMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
EEMX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. EEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EEMX and 0.18% for QQQ.
EEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMX and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer