EEMX vs. DEM
EEMX (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EEMX tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index while DEM tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEMX returned 7.17%/yr vs 9.77%/yr for DEM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.
Performance
EEMX vs. DEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMX achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly higher than DEM's 16.70% return.
EEMX
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 39.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- —
DEM
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- YTD
- 16.70%
- 1Y
- 22.03%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
EEMX vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 19.72% | 35.23% | 7.22% | 9.80% | -19.75% | -3.57% | 19.55% | 18.56% | -16.76% | 38.46% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 16.70% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 20.93% | -10.43% | 11.49% | -5.84% | 19.84% | -7.69% | 26.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMX and DEM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between EEMX and DEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
EEMX vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMX
DEM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Technology
EEMX
DEM
Financial Services
EEMX
DEM
Consumer Cyclical
EEMX
DEM
Communication Services
EEMX
DEM
Industrials
EEMX
DEM
Basic Materials
EEMX
DEM
Consumer Defensive
EEMX
DEM
Healthcare
EEMX
DEM
Utilities
EEMX
DEM
Real Estate
EEMX
DEM
Energy
EEMX
DEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMX vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank
EEMX
DEM
EEMX vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMX | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 2.80 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 9.03 | +0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMX vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMX and DEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMX | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.90% | -51.85% | +11.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -7.89% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -15.64% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.19% | -27.18% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.45% | -3.87% | -5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -12.84% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 2.45% | +1.50% |
Volatility
EEMX vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) has a higher volatility of 11.67% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 5.76%. This indicates that EEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMX | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.67% | 5.76% | +5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.48% | 13.00% | +9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 14.73% | +9.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 15.57% | +4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 17.84% | +2.85% |
EEMX vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMX vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison
EEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than DEM's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.19% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 1.88% | 2.28% | 2.26% | 2.20% | 2.38% | 1.72% | 1.42% | 2.57% | 2.41% | 2.45% | 0.15% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMX and DEM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMX has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to DEM (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMX dropped -39.90% vs DEM's -51.85%.
On 5-year performance, DEM leads with 9.77% vs 7.17% for EEMX. On fees, EEMX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DEM has performed better with a 9.77% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.
DEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 1.88% for EEMX.
EEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index, while DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EEMX and 0.63% for DEM.
EEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMX and DEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer