EEMV vs. SCHD
EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMV returned 7.04%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for SCHD. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
EEMV vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EEMV having a 20.09% return and SCHD slightly lower at 19.96%. Over the past 10 years, EEMV has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 7.04%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.
EEMV
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 20.09%
- 6M
- 21.21%
- 1Y
- 27.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.04%
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
EEMV vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 20.09% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -5.81% | 27.28% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.96% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMV and SCHD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EEMV and SCHD has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EEMV vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMV
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
EEMV
SCHD
Financial Services
EEMV
SCHD
Communication Services
EEMV
SCHD
Industrials
EEMV
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
EEMV
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
EEMV
SCHD
Healthcare
EEMV
SCHD
Utilities
EEMV
SCHD
Energy
EEMV
SCHD
Basic Materials
EEMV
SCHD
Real Estate
EEMV
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMV vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
EEMV
SCHD
EEMV vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.43 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 5.66 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.90 | 13.87 | -2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMV vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.56% | -33.37% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.22% | -4.61% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.47% | -16.13% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -16.85% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -33.37% | +1.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.61% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -3.31% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 1.88% | +0.68% |
Volatility
EEMV vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.14%. This indicates that EEMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 3.14% | +5.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 7.56% | +5.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 10.94% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.22% | 14.39% | -2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 16.72% | -2.73% |
EEMV vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EEMV vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than SCHD's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.07% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMV and SCHD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMV has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to SCHD (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.83% vs 7.04% for EEMV. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EEMV.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 3.07% for EEMV.
EEMV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMV and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer