EEMV vs. REET

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) and REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while REET is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMV returned 6.37%/yr vs 4.04%/yr for REET. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for REET.

Performance

EEMV vs. REET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than REET's 8.47% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMV has outperformed REET with an annualized return of 6.37%, while REET has yielded a comparatively lower 4.04% annualized return.

EEMV

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -1.16%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 14.40%
• 1Y: 20.63%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: 4.95%
• 10Y*: 6.37%

REET

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: 8.47%
• 6M: 9.73%
• 1Y: 11.75%
• 3Y*: 9.05%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: 4.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMV vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	13.43%	13.45%	7.98%	7.75%	-13.94%	5.05%	6.90%	7.83%	-5.81%	27.28%
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	8.47%	7.97%	2.65%	10.28%	-24.10%	32.43%	-10.48%	24.42%	-5.27%	7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMV and REET is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014	0.51

The correlation between EEMV and REET shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEMV vs. REET - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEMV	REET
Technology	28.9%	-
Financial Services	17.7%	0.2%
Communication Services	11.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	-
Industrials	6.7%	-
Healthcare	6.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	-
Utilities	4.6%	-
Energy	3.4%	-
Basic Materials	3.1%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	99.8%

Return for Risk

EEMV vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMV

EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 50
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 53
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 52

REET

REET Risk / Return Rank: 30
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 28
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMV vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EEMV	REET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	0.97	+0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	1.39	+0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.18	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	1.31	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.21	4.68	+3.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EEMV vs. REET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the REET Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMV and REET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EEMV	REET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	0.97	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.11	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.22	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.25	+0.12

Drawdowns

EEMV vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum REET drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and REET.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMV	REET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.56%	-44.59%	+13.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-9.04%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.47%	-18.02%	+5.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.90%	-32.11%	+10.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.56%	-44.59%	+13.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.70%	-2.46%	-2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.97%	-9.78%	+1.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	2.52%	0.00%

Volatility

EEMV vs. REET - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) at 3.56%. This indicates that EEMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEMV	REET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.37%	3.56%	+3.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.79%	8.90%	+3.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.01%	12.17%	+1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.06%	16.95%	-4.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.94%	18.85%	-4.91%

EEMV vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EEMV vs. REET - Dividend Comparison

EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than REET's 3.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	2.33%	2.65%	3.50%	2.75%	1.93%	2.14%	2.45%	2.63%	2.46%	2.34%	2.79%	2.55%
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	3.41%	3.67%	3.64%	3.27%	2.43%	3.18%	2.65%	5.25%	5.73%	3.84%	5.37%	3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEMV and REET in my portfolio?

EEMV and REET have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEMV or REET?

EEMV has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to REET (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs REET's -44.59%.

Which ETF is better, EEMV or REET?

On 10-year performance, EEMV leads with 6.37% vs 4.04% for REET. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEMV or REET?

Over the 10-year period, EEMV has performed better with a 6.37% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEMV or REET?

REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EEMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEMV or REET?

REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.33% for EEMV.

What is the main difference between EEMV and REET?

EEMV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while REET is REIT. EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.14% for REET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.