EEMV vs. REET
EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) and REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while REET is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMV returned 5.61%/yr vs 4.03%/yr for REET. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for REET.
Performance
EEMV vs. REET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 15.40% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMV has outperformed REET with an annualized return of 5.61%, while REET has yielded a comparatively lower 4.03% annualized return.
EEMV
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 15.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.18%
REET
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 1Y
- 19.06%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- 4.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.97%
EEMV vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 11.64% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -5.81% | 27.28% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 15.40% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | -10.48% | 24.42% | -5.27% | 7.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMV and REET is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2014 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EEMV and REET has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMV vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank
EEMV
REET
EEMV vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMV | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.12 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 7.62 | -2.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMV vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum REET drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and REET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMV | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.56% | -44.59% | +13.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.22% | -9.04% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.47% | -18.02% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -32.11% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -44.59% | +13.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.88% | -0.25% | -7.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -9.69% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.51% | +0.38% |
Volatility
EEMV vs. REET - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) at 3.66%. This indicates that EEMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMV | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | 3.66% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.93% | 9.92% | +5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 12.62% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 16.94% | -4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 18.84% | -4.84% |
EEMV vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EEMV vs. REET - Dividend Comparison
EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than REET's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.29% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.26% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMV and REET have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMV has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to REET (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs REET's -44.59%.
On 10-year performance, EEMV leads with 5.61% vs 4.03% for REET. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEMV has performed better with a 5.61% return vs 4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EEMV.
REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.29% for EEMV.
EEMV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while REET is REIT. EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.14% for REET.
REET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMV and REET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer