EEMV vs. EMMF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) and EMMF (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. EEMV is passively managed, while EMMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEMV returned 5.66%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for EMMF. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EEMV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for EMMF.

Performance

EEMV vs. EMMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly lower than EMMF's 21.57% return.

EEMV

• 1D: -3.65%
• 1M: 3.07%
• YTD: 16.76%
• 6M: 16.47%
• 1Y: 24.00%
• 3Y*: 14.12%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 6.81%

EMMF

• 1D: -5.06%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 21.57%
• 6M: 22.05%
• 1Y: 38.99%
• 3Y*: 21.51%
• 5Y*: 10.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMV vs. EMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	16.76%	13.45%	7.98%	7.75%	-13.94%	5.05%	6.90%	7.83%	-4.58%
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	21.57%	21.22%	9.45%	20.59%	-13.47%	5.97%	9.25%	2.30%	-6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMV and EMMF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2018	0.87

The correlation between EEMV and EMMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMV vs. EMMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEMV	EMMF
Technology	36.5%	32.9%
Financial Services	18.0%	8.2%
Communication Services	10.1%	6.6%
Industrials	6.6%	3.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	14.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	4.4%
Healthcare	5.4%	0.3%
Utilities	4.4%	2.0%
Energy	3.6%	2.1%
Basic Materials	2.9%	1.9%
Real Estate	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

EEMV vs. EMMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMV

EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 52
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 56

EMMF

EMMF Risk / Return Rank: 71
EMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
EMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMV vs. EMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEMV	EMMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.03	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.61	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.40	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	3.69	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.38	13.79	-4.41

EEMV vs. EMMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the EMMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMV and EMMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEMV vs. EMMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, roughly equal to the maximum EMMF drawdown of -32.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and EMMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMV	EMMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.56%	-32.57%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-10.62%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.47%	-16.02%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.90%	-24.02%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.65%	-6.18%	+2.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-7.43%	-0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.84%	-0.27%

Volatility

EEMV vs. EMMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) is 8.95%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) has a volatility of 11.36%. This indicates that EEMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEMV	EMMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.95%	11.36%	-2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.17%	17.64%	-3.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	19.26%	-4.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.36%	15.04%	-2.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.97%	16.95%	-2.98%

EEMV vs. EMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMMF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEMV vs. EMMF - Dividend Comparison

EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than EMMF's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	2.19%	2.65%	3.50%	2.75%	1.93%	2.14%	2.45%	2.63%	2.46%	2.34%	2.79%	2.55%
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	1.95%	2.45%	1.30%	1.62%	3.48%	2.64%	1.93%	2.93%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEMV and EMMF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, EEMV and EMMF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EEMV or EMMF?

EMMF has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to EEMV (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs EMMF's -32.57%.

Which ETF is better, EEMV or EMMF?

On 5-year performance, EMMF leads with 10.20% vs 5.66% for EEMV. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EEMV has been the lower-risk option at 8.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEMV or EMMF?

Over the 5-year period, EMMF has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEMV or EMMF?

EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EMMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEMV or EMMF?

EEMV has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.95% for EMMF.

What is the main difference between EEMV and EMMF?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.48% for EMMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.