EEMV vs. ECOW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) and ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EEMV tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index while ECOW tracks the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEMV returned 5.19%/yr vs 7.05%/yr for ECOW. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ECOW.

Performance

EEMV vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EEMV having a 12.37% return and ECOW slightly higher at 12.74%.

EEMV

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -5.60%
• 6M: 8.56%
• YTD: 12.37%
• 1Y: 16.02%
• 3Y*: 11.43%
• 5Y*: 5.19%
• 10Y*: 5.65%

ECOW

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 1.60%
• 6M: 8.22%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 1Y: 30.43%
• 3Y*: 17.04%
• 5Y*: 7.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMV vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	12.37%	13.45%	7.98%	7.75%	-13.94%	5.05%	6.90%	0.53%
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	12.74%	32.50%	3.17%	15.79%	-19.28%	7.47%	-2.51%	10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMV and ECOW is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019	0.68

The correlation between EEMV and ECOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMV vs. ECOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEMV	ECOW
Technology	36.5%	6.8%
Financial Services	18.0%	-
Communication Services	10.1%	12.8%
Industrials	6.6%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	14.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	13.1%
Healthcare	5.4%	3.6%
Utilities	4.4%	7.2%
Energy	3.6%	8.6%
Basic Materials	2.9%	11.1%
Real Estate	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

EEMV vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMV

EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 38
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 37
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 44

ECOW

ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 78
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMV vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEMV	ECOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	2.06	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	2.79	-1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.37	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	3.66	-1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.73	9.98	-4.25

EEMV vs. ECOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the ECOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMV and ECOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEMV vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum ECOW drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and ECOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMV	ECOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.56%	-40.27%	+8.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-8.35%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.47%	-18.77%	+6.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.90%	-33.30%	+11.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.28%	-3.83%	-3.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.94%	-10.98%	+3.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	3.06%	-0.26%

Volatility

EEMV vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) at 4.23%. This indicates that EEMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEMV	ECOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.65%	4.23%	+2.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.92%	12.07%	+2.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.93%	14.85%	+1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.51%	17.78%	-5.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.00%	20.08%	-6.08%

EEMV vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEMV vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison

EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than ECOW's 4.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	4.45%	5.20%	7.35%	5.46%	7.50%	4.39%	3.35%	8.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	2.27%	2.65%	3.50%	2.75%	1.93%	2.14%	2.45%	2.63%	2.46%	2.34%	2.79%	2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEMV and ECOW in my portfolio?

EEMV and ECOW have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEMV or ECOW?

EEMV has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to ECOW (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs ECOW's -40.27%.

Which ETF is better, EEMV or ECOW?

On 5-year performance, ECOW leads with 7.05% vs 5.19% for EEMV. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ECOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEMV or ECOW?

Over the 5-year period, ECOW has performed better with a 7.05% return vs 5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEMV or ECOW?

EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEMV or ECOW?

ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 2.27% for EEMV.

What is the main difference between EEMV and ECOW?

EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.70% for ECOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.