EEMV vs. BBAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) and BBAX (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - EEMV tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index while BBAX tracks the Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEMV returned 5.66%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for BBAX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BBAX.

Performance

EEMV vs. BBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than BBAX's 7.03% return.

EEMV

• 1D: -3.65%
• 1M: 3.07%
• YTD: 16.76%
• 6M: 16.47%
• 1Y: 24.00%
• 3Y*: 14.12%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 6.81%

BBAX

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: -2.67%
• YTD: 7.03%
• 6M: 5.44%
• 1Y: 15.68%
• 3Y*: 12.30%
• 5Y*: 4.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMV vs. BBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	16.76%	13.45%	7.98%	7.75%	-13.94%	5.05%	6.90%	7.83%	-4.43%
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF	7.03%	20.21%	2.50%	5.60%	-4.80%	5.53%	8.02%	18.66%	-9.65%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMV and BBAX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2018	0.78

The correlation between EEMV and BBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMV vs. BBAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEMV	BBAX
Technology	36.5%	0.2%
Financial Services	18.0%	45.0%
Communication Services	10.1%	2.7%
Industrials	6.6%	8.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	3.1%
Healthcare	5.4%	4.1%
Utilities	4.4%	3.2%
Energy	3.6%	2.7%
Basic Materials	2.9%	17.5%
Real Estate	0.6%	8.4%

Return for Risk

EEMV vs. BBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMV

EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 52
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 56

BBAX

BBAX Risk / Return Rank: 32
BBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
BBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
BBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
BBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMV vs. BBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEMV	BBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.05	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	1.51	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.19	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	1.75	+0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.38	5.35	+4.03

EEMV vs. BBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the BBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMV and BBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEMV vs. BBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum BBAX drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and BBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMV	BBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.56%	-39.64%	+8.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-9.01%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.47%	-20.12%	+7.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.90%	-23.21%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.65%	-6.22%	+2.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-7.20%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.94%	-0.37%

Volatility

EEMV vs. BBAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) at 5.61%. This indicates that EEMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEMV	BBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.95%	5.61%	+3.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.17%	12.74%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	15.05%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.36%	17.40%	-5.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.97%	19.70%	-5.73%

EEMV vs. BBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAX's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EEMV vs. BBAX - Dividend Comparison

EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than BBAX's 3.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF	3.70%	3.86%	4.13%	4.17%	5.06%	5.47%	2.57%	4.07%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	2.19%	2.65%	3.50%	2.75%	1.93%	2.14%	2.45%	2.63%	2.46%	2.34%	2.79%	2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEMV and BBAX in my portfolio?

EEMV and BBAX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEMV or BBAX?

EEMV has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to BBAX (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs BBAX's -39.64%.

Which ETF is better, EEMV or BBAX?

On 5-year performance, EEMV leads with 5.66% vs 4.79% for BBAX. On fees, BBAX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEMV or BBAX?

Over the 5-year period, EEMV has performed better with a 5.66% return vs 4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEMV or BBAX?

BBAX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EEMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEMV or BBAX?

BBAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 2.19% for EEMV.

What is the main difference between EEMV and BBAX?

EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while BBAX tracks Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.19% for BBAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.