EEMD vs. TJUN
EEMD (AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMD is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. EEMD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.
Performance
EEMD vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EEMD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TJUN
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEMD vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 5.26% | 11.69% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMD vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEMD | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 2.48 | — |
Drawdowns
EEMD vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMD | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.60% | — |
Volatility
EEMD vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMD | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 7.54% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 7.54% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 7.54% | — |
EEMD vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMD vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison
Neither EEMD nor TJUN has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.03% | 8.41% | 7.66% | 6.34% | 3.84% | 5.35% | 4.91% | 0.42% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, EEMD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEMD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.
EEMD and TJUN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
EEMD is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EEMD and 0.95% for TJUN.
Find the right allocation for EEMD and TJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer