EEMD vs. GEME
EEMD (AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF) and GEME (Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EEMD is passively managed, while GEME is actively managed. EEMD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GEME.
Performance
EEMD vs. GEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EEMD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GEME
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 10.91%
- YTD
- 38.52%
- 6M
- 44.89%
- 1Y
- 82.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEMD vs. GEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 38.52% | 37.35% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMD vs. GEME — Risk / Return Rank
EEMD
GEME
EEMD vs. GEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEMD | GEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 2.66 | — |
Drawdowns
EEMD vs. GEME - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMD | GEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -16.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.23% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.30% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.43% | — |
Volatility
EEMD vs. GEME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMD | GEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 21.23% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.95% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 22.95% | — |
EEMD vs. GEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GEME's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMD vs. GEME - Dividend Comparison
EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GEME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.03% | 8.41% | 7.66% | 6.34% | 3.84% | 5.35% | 4.91% | 0.42% |
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 5.06% | 7.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, EEMD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEMD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GEME.
GEME has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 0.00% for EEMD.
They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Pacific AM. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EEMD and 0.75% for GEME.
Find the right allocation for EEMD and GEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer