PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEM vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEM vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 29.41% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 12.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EEM has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 10.06%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.


EEM

1D
1.03%
1M
10.40%
YTD
29.41%
6M
32.25%
1Y
58.14%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
10.06%

VTV

1D
0.88%
1M
3.55%
YTD
12.28%
6M
14.14%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEM vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
29.41%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.28%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EEM and VTV is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between EEM and VTV has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EEM vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEM
VTV

Technology

43.6%
13.4%

Financial Services

17.5%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
4.0%

Industrials

6.2%
14.0%

Basic Materials

6.1%
3.1%

Communication Services

5.7%
3.3%

Energy

3.3%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
9.4%

Healthcare

2.5%
14.5%

Utilities

2.0%
5.2%

Real Estate

0.9%
2.8%

Technology

EEM
43.6%
VTV
13.4%

Financial Services

EEM
17.5%
VTV
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EEM
8.1%
VTV
4.0%

Industrials

EEM
6.2%
VTV
14.0%

Basic Materials

EEM
6.1%
VTV
3.1%

Communication Services

EEM
5.7%
VTV
3.3%

Energy

EEM
3.3%
VTV
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

EEM
2.7%
VTV
9.4%

Healthcare

EEM
2.5%
VTV
14.5%

Utilities

EEM
2.0%
VTV
5.2%

Real Estate

EEM
0.9%
VTV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEM vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEM vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMVTVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.93

2.67

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.75

3.82

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.48

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

4.27

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.94

16.15

+0.78

EEM vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEM and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

2.67

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.82

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.75

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.51

-0.13

Drawdowns

EEM vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.43%

-59.27%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-6.35%

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-14.52%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.71%

-17.04%

-20.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

-36.78%

-3.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.02%

-7.87%

-8.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

1.68%

+1.82%

Volatility

EEM vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.36%

2.65%

+5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.36%

7.59%

+9.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.93%

10.11%

+9.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

13.88%

+5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

16.67%

+3.83%

EEM vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEM vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.72%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEM and VTV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEM has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 10.06% for EEM. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.72% for EEM.

EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.04% for VTV.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEM and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer