PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEM vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEM vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 27.80% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 11.67% return. Over the past 10 years, EEM has underperformed VBR with an annualized return of 9.93%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.


EEM

1D
-1.24%
1M
9.08%
YTD
27.80%
6M
30.51%
1Y
55.80%
3Y*
23.95%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
9.93%

VBR

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.39%
YTD
11.67%
6M
11.95%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
10.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEM vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
27.80%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
11.67%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EEM and VBR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.68

The correlation between EEM and VBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEM vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEM
VBR

Technology

43.6%
10.6%

Financial Services

17.5%
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
12.4%

Industrials

6.2%
18.1%

Basic Materials

6.1%
6.3%

Communication Services

5.7%
2.5%

Energy

3.3%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.0%

Healthcare

2.5%
7.9%

Utilities

2.0%
4.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
10.1%

Technology

EEM
43.6%
VBR
10.6%

Financial Services

EEM
17.5%
VBR
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EEM
8.1%
VBR
12.4%

Industrials

EEM
6.2%
VBR
18.1%

Basic Materials

EEM
6.1%
VBR
6.3%

Communication Services

EEM
5.7%
VBR
2.5%

Energy

EEM
3.3%
VBR
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

EEM
2.7%
VBR
4.0%

Healthcare

EEM
2.5%
VBR
7.9%

Utilities

EEM
2.0%
VBR
4.8%

Real Estate

EEM
0.9%
VBR
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEM vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEM vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.30

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

2.93

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.99

10.32

+5.66

EEM vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEM and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMVBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.71

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.40

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.49

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.42

-0.04

Drawdowns

EEM vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than VBR's maximum drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.43%

-61.98%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-8.85%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-24.19%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.71%

-24.19%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

-45.28%

+5.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.39%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.02%

-8.27%

-7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.50%

+1.00%

Volatility

EEM vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.96%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

3.96%

+4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.42%

10.46%

+6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.97%

15.17%

+4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

19.77%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

21.73%

-1.23%

EEM vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEM vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than VBR's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.74%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.76%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEM and VBR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to VBR (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.53% vs 9.93% for EEM. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.74% for EEM.

EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.05% for VBR.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEM and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer