EEM vs. VBR
EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEM returned 9.93%/yr vs 10.53%/yr for VBR. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEM charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VBR.
Performance
EEM vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 27.80% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 11.67% return. Over the past 10 years, EEM has underperformed VBR with an annualized return of 9.93%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.
EEM
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 9.08%
- YTD
- 27.80%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 55.80%
- 3Y*
- 23.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
VBR
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
EEM vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 27.80% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 11.67% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEM and VBR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EEM and VBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EEM vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEM
VBR
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EEM
VBR
Financial Services
EEM
VBR
Consumer Cyclical
EEM
VBR
Industrials
EEM
VBR
Basic Materials
EEM
VBR
Communication Services
EEM
VBR
Energy
EEM
VBR
Consumer Defensive
EEM
VBR
Healthcare
EEM
VBR
Utilities
EEM
VBR
Real Estate
EEM
VBR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEM vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank
EEM
VBR
EEM vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEM | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.30 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.15 | 2.93 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.99 | 10.32 | +5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEM | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 1.71 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.40 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.42 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
EEM vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than VBR's maximum drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and VBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEM | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.43% | -61.98% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -8.85% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.29% | -24.19% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.71% | -24.19% | -13.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.82% | -45.28% | +5.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -0.39% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.02% | -8.27% | -7.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 2.50% | +1.00% |
Volatility
EEM vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.96%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEM | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 3.96% | +4.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.42% | 10.46% | +6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.97% | 15.17% | +4.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 19.77% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 21.73% | -1.23% |
EEM vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEM vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than VBR's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.74% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEM and VBR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to VBR (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs VBR's -61.98%.
On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.53% vs 9.93% for EEM. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.74% for EEM.
EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.05% for VBR.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEM and VBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer