EELDX vs. QLENX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EELDX (Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund) and QLENX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N) are both mutual funds - EELDX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance, while QLENX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR Funds. Over the past 10 years, EELDX returned 7.96%/yr vs 11.68%/yr for QLENX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EELDX charges 0.78%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for QLENX.

Performance

EELDX vs. QLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EELDX achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly higher than QLENX's -1.51% return. Over the past 10 years, EELDX has underperformed QLENX with an annualized return of 7.96%, while QLENX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.68% annualized return.

EELDX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 6.66%
• 6M: 8.02%
• 1Y: 18.24%
• 3Y*: 14.78%
• 5Y*: 8.04%
• 10Y*: 7.96%

QLENX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: -1.51%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 14.37%
• 3Y*: 25.84%
• 5Y*: 21.74%
• 10Y*: 11.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EELDX vs. QLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	6.66%	15.80%	14.87%	11.46%	-6.14%	1.55%	7.44%	18.34%	-4.27%	13.05%
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N	-1.51%	34.07%	30.18%	23.67%	18.92%	30.70%	-14.18%	1.01%	-16.64%	15.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EELDX and QLENX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.21

Return for Risk

EELDX vs. QLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EELDX

EELDX Risk / Return Rank: 98
EELDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EELDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EELDX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EELDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EELDX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

QLENX

QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 64
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EELDX vs. QLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EELDX	QLENX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.24	2.00	+3.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.07	2.93	+5.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.37	1.36	+1.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.94	2.43	+2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.13	7.52	+12.61

EELDX vs. QLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EELDX Sharpe Ratio is 5.24, which is higher than the QLENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EELDX and QLENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EELDX vs. QLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EELDX drawdown since its inception was -19.12%, smaller than the maximum QLENX drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EELDX and QLENX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EELDX	QLENX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.12%	-38.50%	+19.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.68%	-6.09%	+2.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.98%	-7.09%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.35%	-17.19%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.12%	-38.50%	+19.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.13%	+2.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.90%	-7.47%	+4.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	1.97%	-1.07%

Volatility

EELDX vs. QLENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) is 0.61%, while AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that EELDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EELDX	QLENX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	2.67%	-2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.03%	5.80%	-2.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.47%	7.39%	-3.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.62%	10.09%	-5.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.73%	10.59%	-5.86%

EELDX vs. QLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EELDX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than QLENX's 1.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

EELDX vs. QLENX - Dividend Comparison

EELDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than QLENX's 1.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	10.78%	9.44%	8.58%	9.02%	9.17%	7.87%	7.71%	7.86%	8.16%	7.90%	4.12%	1.65%
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N	1.66%	1.64%	7.13%	21.21%	14.09%	0.00%	1.59%	0.00%	6.09%	8.91%	2.87%	4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EELDX and QLENX in my portfolio?

EELDX and QLENX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EELDX or QLENX?

QLENX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to EELDX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EELDX dropped -19.12% vs QLENX's -38.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EELDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.24 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.