EELDX vs. FGBFX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) and Fidelity Global Credit Fund (FGBFX).

EELDX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Feb 3, 2013. FGBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 22, 2012.

Performance

EELDX vs. FGBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) and Fidelity Global Credit Fund (FGBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EELDX vs. FGBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	1.33%	15.80%	14.87%	11.46%	-6.14%	1.55%	7.44%	18.34%	-4.27%	13.05%
FGBFX Fidelity Global Credit Fund	0.00%	7.82%	8.41%	7.14%	-19.74%	-0.53%	8.25%	14.65%	-2.82%	8.90%

Returns By Period

EELDX

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -3.19%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 6M: 6.65%
• 1Y: 15.07%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: 7.74%
• 10Y*: 7.76%

FGBFX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EELDX vs. FGBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EELDX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FGBFX's 0.70% expense ratio.

EELDX

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund

FGBFX

Fidelity Global Credit Fund

Return for Risk

EELDX vs. FGBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EELDX

EELDX Risk / Return Rank: 98
EELDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
EELDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
EELDX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EELDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
EELDX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EELDX vs. FGBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) and Fidelity Global Credit Fund (FGBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EELDX	FGBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.99	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.53	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.96	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.15	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EELDX	FGBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between EELDX and FGBFX is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EELDX vs. FGBFX - Dividend Comparison

EELDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, more than FGBFX's 3.04% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	11.20%	9.44%	8.58%	9.02%	9.17%	7.87%	7.71%	7.86%	8.16%	7.90%	4.12%	1.65%
FGBFX Fidelity Global Credit Fund	3.04%	3.04%	3.68%	3.69%	6.53%	2.53%	3.69%	3.73%	2.67%	1.98%	2.98%	2.72%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EELDX	FGBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.68%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.94%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EELDX	FGBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.72%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.59%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.76%	—	—