PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EEI.L vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EEI.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EEI.L (WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds - EEI.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEI.L returned 4.18%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EEI.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

EEI.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEI.L achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EEI.L has underperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 4.18%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.

EEI.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.61%
YTD
10.61%
6M
13.56%
1Y
22.61%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
4.18%

CMU.L

1D
0.33%
1M
8.13%
YTD
15.89%
6M
17.12%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEI.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEI.L
WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF		10.61%26.84%-7.65%5.93%0.84%5.79%-16.98%9.05%-10.50%9.28%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select		15.89%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EEI.L and CMU.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2014

0.85

The correlation between EEI.L and CMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEI.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EEI.L
CMU.L

Financial Services

24.7%
21.8%

Utilities

16.7%
5.8%

Industrials

15.3%
15.7%

Energy

11.6%
0.0%

Communication Services

8.6%
2.3%

Basic Materials

8.3%
2.8%

Real Estate

4.8%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
10.1%

Healthcare

2.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
5.2%

Technology

1.5%
30.8%

Financial Services

EEI.L
24.7%
CMU.L
21.8%

Utilities

EEI.L
16.7%
CMU.L
5.8%

Industrials

EEI.L
15.3%
CMU.L
15.7%

Energy

EEI.L
11.6%
CMU.L
0.0%

Communication Services

EEI.L
8.6%
CMU.L
2.3%

Basic Materials

EEI.L
8.3%
CMU.L
2.8%

Real Estate

EEI.L
4.8%
CMU.L
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EEI.L
3.3%
CMU.L
10.1%

Healthcare

EEI.L
2.8%
CMU.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

EEI.L
2.3%
CMU.L
5.2%

Technology

EEI.L
1.5%
CMU.L
30.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF

Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select

Often compared with EEI.L:
EEI.L vs. EEIP.LEEI.L vs. FEUI.LEEI.L vs. FEQD.LEEI.L vs. FEUQ.DEEEI.L vs. IUKD.LEEI.L vs. SDUE.LEEI.L vs. BTCW
Often compared with CMU.L:
CMU.L vs. CEUR.LCMU.L vs. GLDCMU.L vs. UB06.LCMU.L vs. FLXD.LCMU.L vs. 100D.LCMU.L vs. 500U.LCMU.L vs. BNKE.L

Return for Risk

EEI.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EEI.L
EEI.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EEI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EEI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEI.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EEI.LCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.07
1.98

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.72
2.79

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.58

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.53

9.67

+0.86

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EEI.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEI.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEI.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EEI.LCMU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.98

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.66

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.65

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.49

-0.27

Drawdowns

EEI.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEI.L drawdown since its inception was -37.68%, which is greater than CMU.L's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEI.L and CMU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EEI.LCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.68%

-32.53%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-11.43%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-11.95%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-21.11%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.68%

-31.41%

-6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-0.18%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.38%

-5.80%

-5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

3.05%

-0.91%

Volatility

EEI.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L) is 3.45%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that EEI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EEI.LCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

5.34%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

12.44%

-3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

14.86%

-3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

16.00%

-2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

16.78%

-1.26%

EEI.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEI.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEI.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

EEI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEI.L
WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF		0.05%0.05%0.07%0.06%0.05%0.05%0.06%0.06%0.05%0.04%0.03%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

EEI.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for EEI.L.

EEI.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EEI.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEI.L and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer