PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEE vs. CLSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEE vs. CLSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Ethereum 75/25 Strategy ETF (EEE) and Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EEE

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.00%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLSM

1D
-1.19%
1M
0.19%
6M
13.64%
YTD
15.63%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEE vs. CLSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EEE and CLSM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEE vs. CLSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CLSM
CLSM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CLSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEE vs. CLSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Ethereum 75/25 Strategy ETF (EEE) and Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEECLSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.81

EEE vs. CLSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEE vs. CLSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEE drawdown since its inception was -13.28%, smaller than the maximum CLSM drawdown of -27.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEE and CLSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEECLSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-27.77%

+14.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-4.37%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-16.24%

+10.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

Volatility

EEE vs. CLSM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEECLSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.61%

14.11%

+8.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.61%

12.71%

+9.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.61%

12.71%

+9.90%

EEE vs. CLSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CLSM's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEE vs. CLSM - Dividend Comparison

EEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than CLSM's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CLSM
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF
0.78%0.90%2.13%2.58%3.17%0.59%
EEE
CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Ethereum 75/25 Strategy ETF
0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEE and CLSM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CLSM is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLSM is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EEE.

CLSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.09% for EEE.

EEE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CLSM is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EEE and 0.82% for CLSM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEE and CLSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer