PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEE.L vs. OLA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EEE.L vs. OLA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Empire Metals Limited (EEE.L) and Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EEE.L is traded in GBp, while OLA.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the OLA.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEE.L achieves a -9.49% return, which is significantly higher than OLA.TO's -16.36% return. Over the past 10 years, EEE.L has underperformed OLA.TO with an annualized return of 8.23%, while OLA.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 56.90% annualized return.


EEE.L

1D
-0.56%
1M
13.50%
YTD
-9.49%
6M
-5.87%
1Y
199.15%
3Y*
150.34%
5Y*
67.22%
10Y*
8.23%

OLA.TO

1D
-5.60%
1M
-13.05%
YTD
-16.36%
6M
-16.56%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
30.79%
5Y*
21.70%
10Y*
56.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEE.L vs. OLA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEE.L
Empire Metals Limited
-9.49%469.34%-26.34%463.64%43.48%-69.74%130.30%-72.95%-66.34%130.16%
OLA.TO
Orla Mining Ltd.
-16.36%125.71%72.67%-23.40%18.45%-28.40%239.59%92.38%-42.37%39.07%

Correlation

The correlation between EEE.L and OLA.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2010

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EEE.L:

£246.55M

OLA.TO:

CA$6.21B

EPS

EEE.L:

-£0.01

OLA.TO:

CA$0.82

PB Ratio

EEE.L:

14.41

OLA.TO:

5.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

EEE.L:

£0.00

OLA.TO:

CA$1.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EEE.L:

-£113.72K

OLA.TO:

CA$848.41M

EBITDA (TTM)

EEE.L:

-£7.61M

OLA.TO:

CA$966.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEE.L vs. OLA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEE.L
EEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

OLA.TO
OLA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
OLA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEE.L vs. OLA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Empire Metals Limited (EEE.L) and Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEE.LOLA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.07

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

0.02

+3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.84

0.04

+4.80

EEE.L vs. OLA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the OLA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEE.L and OLA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEE.LOLA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

0.01

+1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.38

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.75

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

0.15

-0.31

Drawdowns

EEE.L vs. OLA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEE.L drawdown since its inception was -99.91%, roughly equal to the maximum OLA.TO drawdown of -97.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEE.L and OLA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEE.LOLA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.91%

-97.73%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.56%

-48.45%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.56%

-48.45%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.59%

-48.81%

-25.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.95%

-51.73%

-45.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.78%

-48.45%

-47.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.30%

-29.27%

-65.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.96%

20.18%

+20.78%

Volatility

EEE.L vs. OLA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Empire Metals Limited (EEE.L) is 17.52%, while Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO) has a volatility of 23.35%. This indicates that EEE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OLA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEE.LOLA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.52%

23.35%

-5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.15%

51.67%

-5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.39%

73.32%

+31.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.37%

58.18%

+36.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.99%

77.52%

+31.47%

Dividends

EEE.L vs. OLA.TO - Dividend Comparison

EEE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OLA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.


PositionTTM
EEE.L
Empire Metals Limited
0.00%
OLA.TO
Orla Mining Ltd.
0.27%

Financials

EEE.L vs. OLA.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Empire Metals Limited and Orla Mining Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M2021202220232024202520260
519.71M
(EEE.L) Total Revenue
(OLA.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. EEE.L values in GBp, OLA.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


EEE.L and OLA.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEE.L and OLA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer