EEE.L vs. AEM.TO
EEE.L (Empire Metals Limited) and AEM.TO (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — EEE.L in Other Precious Metals & Mining, AEM.TO in Gold. Over the past 10 years, EEE.L returned 8.23%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for AEM.TO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
EEE.L vs. AEM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EEE.L is traded in GBp, while AEM.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AEM.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEE.L achieves a -9.49% return, which is significantly lower than AEM.TO's 1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, EEE.L has underperformed AEM.TO with an annualized return of 8.23%, while AEM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.07% annualized return.
EEE.L
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 13.50%
- YTD
- -9.49%
- 6M
- -5.87%
- 1Y
- 199.15%
- 3Y*
- 150.34%
- 5Y*
- 67.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
AEM.TO
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 42.18%
- 3Y*
- 47.95%
- 5Y*
- 23.56%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
EEE.L vs. AEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEE.L Empire Metals Limited | -9.49% | 469.34% | -26.34% | 463.64% | 43.48% | -69.74% | 130.30% | -72.95% | -66.34% | 130.16% |
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.85% | 104.01% | 48.56% | 3.63% | 12.94% | -21.57% | 12.58% | 48.22% | -6.17% | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEE.L and AEM.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2010 | -0.00 |
Fundamentals
EEE.L:
£246.55M
AEM.TO:
CA$119.77B
EEE.L:
-£0.01
AEM.TO:
CA$10.65
EEE.L:
14.41
AEM.TO:
4.56
EEE.L:
£0.00
AEM.TO:
CA$13.56B
EEE.L:
-£113.72K
AEM.TO:
CA$8.26B
EEE.L:
-£7.61M
AEM.TO:
CA$9.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEE.L vs. AEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EEE.L
AEM.TO
EEE.L vs. AEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Empire Metals Limited (EEE.L) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEE.L | AEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.20 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 1.33 | +1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 3.40 | +1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEE.L | AEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.01 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.69 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | 0.45 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.26 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
EEE.L vs. AEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEE.L drawdown since its inception was -99.91%, which is greater than AEM.TO's maximum drawdown of -73.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEE.L and AEM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEE.L | AEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.91% | -73.54% | -26.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.56% | -31.94% | -28.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.56% | -31.94% | -28.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.59% | -36.50% | -38.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.95% | -50.31% | -46.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.78% | -31.94% | -63.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.30% | -32.47% | -61.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.96% | 12.43% | +28.53% |
Volatility
EEE.L vs. AEM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Empire Metals Limited (EEE.L) has a higher volatility of 17.52% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) at 13.92%. This indicates that EEE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEE.L | AEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.52% | 13.92% | +3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.15% | 33.64% | +12.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.39% | 42.15% | +62.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.37% | 34.42% | +59.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.99% | 36.10% | +72.89% |
Dividends
EEE.L vs. AEM.TO - Dividend Comparison
EEE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 0.72% | 0.96% | 1.95% | 2.99% | 2.96% | 3.13% | 1.41% | 0.92% | 1.04% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 1.13% |
EEE.L Empire Metals Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EEE.L vs. AEM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Empire Metals Limited and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EEE.L and AEM.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EEE.L and AEM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer