EDZ vs. WTIU
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU).
EDZ and WTIU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDZ is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%). It was launched on Dec 17, 2008. WTIU is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). It was launched on Feb 16, 2023. Both EDZ and WTIU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EDZ vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EDZ vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | -16.24% | -59.30% | -12.71% | -4.88% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 141.86% | -17.13% | -29.63% | -28.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDZ achieves a -16.24% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 141.86% return.
EDZ
- 1D
- -10.95%
- 1M
- 26.71%
- YTD
- -16.24%
- 6M
- -25.08%
- 1Y
- -61.49%
- 3Y*
- -35.39%
- 5Y*
- -16.80%
- 10Y*
- -32.46%
WTIU
- 1D
- -5.22%
- 1M
- 43.87%
- YTD
- 141.86%
- 6M
- 115.33%
- 1Y
- 68.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDZ vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDZ has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EDZ vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
EDZ
WTIU
EDZ vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDZ | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | 0.85 | -1.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | 1.47 | -3.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.21 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 1.42 | -2.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 2.65 | -3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDZ | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | 0.85 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | 0.00 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between EDZ and WTIU is -0.22. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
EDZ vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
EDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | 5.27% | 6.58% | 4.87% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 1.67% | 0.68% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EDZ vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDZ drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than WTIU's maximum drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDZ and WTIU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDZ | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -75.73% | -24.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.29% | -53.11% | -26.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -14.27% | -85.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.71% | -39.51% | -58.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.30% | 28.50% | +31.80% |
Volatility
EDZ vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) has a higher volatility of 31.12% compared to MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) at 17.75%. This indicates that EDZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EDZ | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.12% | 17.75% | +13.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.41% | 44.75% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.73% | 80.86% | -20.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.63% | 69.25% | -13.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.46% | 69.25% | -8.79% |