EDZ vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EDZ (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EDZ is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, EDZ returned -74.18% vs 5016.23% for MULL. At a correlation of -0.56, they often move in opposite directions. EDZ charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

EDZ vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDZ achieves a -56.25% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 774.91% return.

EDZ

• 1D: 3.62%
• 1M: -18.11%
• YTD: -56.25%
• 6M: -58.86%
• 1Y: -74.18%
• 3Y*: -48.04%
• 5Y*: -24.82%
• 10Y*: -36.41%

MULL

• 1D: -15.62%
• 1M: 119.20%
• YTD: 774.91%
• 6M: 1,229.17%
• 1Y: 5,016.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDZ vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares	-56.25%	-59.30%	7.39%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	774.91%	558.51%	-40.10%

Correlation

The correlation between EDZ and MULL is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	-0.56

The correlation between EDZ and MULL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.58 to -0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDZ vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDZ	MULL
Financial Services	26.2%	-
Industrials	19.7%	-
Technology	14.6%	66.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	-
Utilities	7.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	-
Healthcare	5.9%	-
Energy	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	3.7%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	-
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

EDZ vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDZ

EDZ Risk / Return Rank: 0
EDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
EDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
EDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
EDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDZ vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDZ	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.25	38.21	-39.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.59	6.62	-9.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.70	1.83	-1.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	96.00	-96.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.68	321.55	-323.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDZ vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 38.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDZ and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDZ	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.25	38.21	-39.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.60	6.53	-7.13

Drawdowns

EDZ vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDZ drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDZ and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDZ	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-72.29%	-27.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.74%	-53.09%	-22.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-89.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-15.62%	-84.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-97.73%	-20.61%	-77.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.50%	15.82%	+28.68%

Volatility

EDZ vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) is 25.57%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 57.59%. This indicates that EDZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDZ	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.57%	57.59%	-32.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.95%	107.25%	-55.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.51%	133.41%	-73.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.00%	136.72%	-79.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.97%	136.72%	-75.75%

EDZ vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDZ has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDZ vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

EDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares	10.10%	6.58%	4.87%	4.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.82%	1.67%	0.68%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDZ and MULL in my portfolio?

EDZ and MULL have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDZ or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (57.59%) compared to EDZ (25.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDZ dropped -99.99% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, EDZ or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 5016.23% vs -74.18% for EDZ. On fees, EDZ is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, EDZ has been the lower-risk option at 25.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDZ or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 5016.23% return vs -74.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDZ or MULL?

EDZ is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDZ or MULL?

EDZ has the higher dividend yield at 10.10%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

What is the main difference between EDZ and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for EDZ and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (38.21 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.