EDZ vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EDZ (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EDZ is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, EDZ returned -77.56% vs 2279.34% for INTW. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. EDZ charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

EDZ vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDZ achieves a -62.28% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 871.59% return.

EDZ

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -26.11%
• YTD: -62.28%
• 6M: -63.64%
• 1Y: -77.56%
• 3Y*: -50.67%
• 5Y*: -27.89%
• 10Y*: -37.86%

INTW

• 1D: 10.59%
• 1M: 28.23%
• YTD: 871.59%
• 6M: 897.00%
• 1Y: 2,279.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDZ vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares	-62.28%	-54.01%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	871.59%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EDZ and INTW is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	-0.40

EDZ vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDZ	INTW
Financial Services	26.2%	-
Industrials	19.7%	-
Technology	14.6%	66.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	-
Utilities	7.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	-
Healthcare	5.9%	-
Energy	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	3.7%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	-
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

EDZ vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDZ

EDZ Risk / Return Rank: 0
EDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
EDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
EDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
EDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDZ vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDZ	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.18	15.45	-16.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.58	5.37	-7.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.70	1.68	-0.98
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.01	46.81	-47.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.70	106.28	-107.98

EDZ vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.18, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 15.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDZ and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EDZ vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDZ drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDZ and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDZ	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-60.58%	-39.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.00%	-49.34%	-27.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-90.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	0.00%	-99.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-97.73%	-29.71%	-68.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.71%	21.69%	+25.02%

Volatility

EDZ vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) is 32.85%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 53.88%. This indicates that EDZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDZ	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.85%	53.88%	-21.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.98%	118.13%	-59.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.85%	149.77%	-83.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.44%	148.63%	-90.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.54%	148.63%	-87.09%

EDZ vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDZ has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDZ vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

EDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.71%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares	11.71%	6.58%	4.87%	4.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.82%	1.67%	0.68%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDZ and INTW in my portfolio?

EDZ and INTW have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDZ or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (53.88%) compared to EDZ (32.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDZ dropped -99.99% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, EDZ or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 2279.34% vs -77.56% for EDZ. On fees, EDZ is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, EDZ has been the lower-risk option at 32.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDZ or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 2279.34% return vs -77.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDZ or INTW?

EDZ is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDZ or INTW?

EDZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.71%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between EDZ and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for EDZ and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.45 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.