EDV vs. SCHP
EDV (Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDV returned -3.49%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for SCHP. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
EDV vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDV achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than SCHP's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EDV has underperformed SCHP with an annualized return of -3.49%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively higher 2.60% annualized return.
EDV
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 3.37%
- 3Y*
- -4.76%
- 5Y*
- -10.27%
- 10Y*
- -3.49%
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
EDV vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | 0.01% | 0.65% | -12.78% | 1.65% | -39.15% | -6.19% | 23.59% | 18.67% | -3.40% | 13.94% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.42% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDV and SCHP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | 0.73 |
The correlation between EDV and SCHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDV vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
EDV
SCHP
EDV vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDV | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.25 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 2.45 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | 7.41 | -7.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDV vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDV drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDV and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDV | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.96% | -14.26% | -45.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -1.93% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.99% | -4.48% | -22.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.03% | -14.26% | -40.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.96% | -14.26% | -45.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.12% | -0.44% | -53.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.48% | -3.93% | -19.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.55% | 0.64% | +4.91% |
Volatility
EDV vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.02%. This indicates that EDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDV | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 1.02% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.89% | 2.24% | +7.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.54% | 3.30% | +11.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 6.12% | +15.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 5.59% | +14.23% |
EDV vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EDV vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
EDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than SCHP's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | 4.95% | 4.94% | 4.65% | 3.81% | 3.28% | 1.95% | 5.54% | 3.51% | 2.90% | 2.92% | 5.32% | 4.24% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDV and SCHP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDV has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDV dropped -59.96% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 10-year performance, SCHP leads with 2.60% vs -3.49% for EDV. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHP has performed better with a 2.60% return vs -3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for EDV.
EDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 3.99% for SCHP.
EDV is categorized as Government Bonds, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. EDV tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for EDV and 0.03% for SCHP.
SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDV and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer