EDOW vs. DYLG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EDOW (First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF) and DYLG (Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDOW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while DYLG is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe DJIA Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EDOW returned 18.49% vs 17.86% for DYLG. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EDOW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DYLG.

Performance

EDOW vs. DYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOW achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly higher than DYLG's 4.63% return.

EDOW

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: 3.18%
• YTD: 5.68%
• 6M: 5.68%
• 1Y: 18.49%
• 3Y*: 15.49%
• 5Y*: 8.89%
• 10Y*: —

DYLG

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 3.69%
• YTD: 4.63%
• 6M: 5.52%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOW vs. DYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF	5.68%	15.46%	13.17%	6.59%
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF	4.63%	12.50%	14.46%	4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOW and DYLG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2023	0.94

The correlation between EDOW and DYLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDOW vs. DYLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDOW	DYLG
Technology	20.0%	17.1%
Financial Services	17.5%	27.2%
Industrials	13.6%	18.4%
Healthcare	13.4%	13.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	9.9%	4.4%
Communication Services	6.5%	1.9%
Energy	3.3%	2.4%
Basic Materials	3.3%	4.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EDOW vs. DYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOW

EDOW Risk / Return Rank: 48
EDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
EDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
EDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
EDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 47

DYLG

DYLG Risk / Return Rank: 53
DYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
DYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOW vs. DYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDOW	DYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.90	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.74	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.35	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	2.16	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.89	8.78	-0.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDOW vs. DYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the DYLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOW and DYLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDOW	DYLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.90	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.10	-0.47

Drawdowns

EDOW vs. DYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than DYLG's maximum drawdown of -13.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and DYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDOW	DYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.72%	-13.98%	-19.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-8.31%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-0.65%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-1.86%	-2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	2.04%	+0.31%

Volatility

EDOW vs. DYLG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) at 2.46%. This indicates that EDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDOW	DYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.74%	2.46%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.92%	7.46%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.68%	9.44%	+1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.21%	11.44%	+2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.74%	11.44%	+6.30%

EDOW vs. DYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DYLG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDOW vs. DYLG - Dividend Comparison

EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than DYLG's 9.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF	9.54%	9.63%	16.55%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF	1.24%	1.31%	1.65%	1.93%	1.91%	1.52%	1.84%	1.88%	1.82%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDOW and DYLG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, EDOW and DYLG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EDOW or DYLG?

EDOW has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to DYLG (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOW dropped -33.72% vs DYLG's -13.98%.

Which ETF is better, EDOW or DYLG?

On 1-year performance, EDOW leads with 18.49% vs 17.86% for DYLG. On fees, DYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DYLG has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDOW or DYLG?

Over the 1-year period, EDOW has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 17.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDOW or DYLG?

DYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EDOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDOW or DYLG?

DYLG has the higher dividend yield at 9.54%, compared with 1.24% for EDOW.

What is the main difference between EDOW and DYLG?

EDOW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DYLG is Derivative Income. EDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while DYLG tracks Cboe DJIA Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EDOW and 0.35% for DYLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.