EDOC vs. YCS
EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - EDOC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOC returned -14.64%/yr vs 23.52%/yr for YCS. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
EDOC vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -10.37% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.63% return.
EDOC
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- -10.37%
- 6M
- -12.67%
- 1Y
- -16.13%
- 3Y*
- -8.12%
- 5Y*
- -14.64%
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 23.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
EDOC vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -10.37% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.63% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOC and YCS is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | -0.11 |
The correlation between EDOC and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOC vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC
YCS
EDOC vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOC | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.34 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 3.78 | -4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 11.93 | -12.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOC vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -49.56% | -16.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -8.30% | -22.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.78% | -23.05% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.36% | -27.32% | -33.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.31% | -0.14% | -61.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.20% | -19.87% | -23.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.98% | 2.65% | +13.33% |
Volatility
EDOC vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that EDOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 2.25% | +5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.63% | 12.19% | +4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.43% | 16.93% | +5.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.46% | 21.10% | +5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 18.82% | +7.46% |
EDOC vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOC vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOC and YCS have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDOC has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.52% vs -14.64% for EDOC. On fees, EDOC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.52% return vs -14.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDOC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
EDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
EDOC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOC and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer