EDOC vs. UNHW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDOC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. EDOC is passively managed, while UNHW is actively managed. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.

Performance

EDOC vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 28.89% return.

EDOC

• 1D: 2.94%
• 1M: -4.37%
• 6M: -2.05%
• YTD: -5.19%
• 1Y: -10.31%
• 3Y*: -6.93%
• 5Y*: -12.95%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -9.16%

UNHW

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -2.71%
• 6M: 54.46%
• YTD: 28.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF	$260.96K	$227.88K	$213.27K
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	$423.60K	$609.21K	$366.99K

EDOC vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF	-5.19%	-5.47%
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	28.89%	1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOC and UNHW is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.29

Return for Risk

EDOC vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDOC

EDOC Risk / Return Rank: 6
EDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
EDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
EDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 7

UNHW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDOC vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDOC	UNHW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.61	—	—

Drawdowns

EDOC vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and UNHW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDOC	UNHW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.76%	-32.28%	-33.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.07%	-5.84%	-53.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.49%	-9.80%	-33.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EDOC	UNHW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.91%	46.31%	-23.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.67%	46.31%	-19.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.27%	46.31%	-20.04%

EDOC vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDOC vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than UNHW's 22.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF	0.26%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	22.57%	2.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDOC and UNHW in my portfolio?

EDOC and UNHW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EDOC or UNHW?

On fees, EDOC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDOC or UNHW?

EDOC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDOC or UNHW?

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 22.57%, compared with 0.26% for EDOC.

What is the main difference between EDOC and UNHW?

EDOC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 0.99% for UNHW.