EDOC vs. RSPH
EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and RSPH (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - EDOC tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net while RSPH tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOC returned -14.71%/yr vs 2.54%/yr for RSPH. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPH.
Performance
EDOC vs. RSPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -15.57% return, which is significantly lower than RSPH's -2.71% return.
EDOC
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -15.57%
- 6M
- -20.78%
- 1Y
- -22.08%
- 3Y*
- -10.46%
- 5Y*
- -14.71%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPH
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- -2.71%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- 8.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
EDOC vs. RSPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -15.57% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 23.87% |
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | -2.71% | 9.52% | -0.94% | 3.95% | -9.40% | 23.19% | 9.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOC and RSPH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between EDOC and RSPH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOC vs. RSPH — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC
RSPH
EDOC vs. RSPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDOC | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.11 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 0.80 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 2.01 | -3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDOC | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | 0.57 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.56 | 0.16 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.39 | 0.58 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
EDOC vs. RSPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than RSPH's maximum drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and RSPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -40.49% | -25.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -10.87% | -19.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.78% | -17.13% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.36% | -21.95% | -38.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.55% | -6.83% | -56.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.02% | -6.14% | -36.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.13% | 4.33% | +10.80% |
Volatility
EDOC vs. RSPH - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) at 3.87%. This indicates that EDOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 3.87% | +1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.69% | 10.36% | +5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.89% | 15.46% | +6.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.37% | 16.26% | +10.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.18% | 17.72% | +8.46% |
EDOC vs. RSPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPH's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOC vs. RSPH - Dividend Comparison
EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than RSPH's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.39% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | 0.73% | 0.70% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.64% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.54% | 0.53% | 0.47% | 0.48% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOC and RSPH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDOC has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to RSPH (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs RSPH's -40.49%.
On 5-year performance, RSPH leads with 2.54% vs -14.71% for EDOC. On fees, RSPH is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPH has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RSPH has performed better with a 2.54% return vs -14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPH is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for EDOC.
RSPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.39% for EDOC.
EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while RSPH tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 0.40% for RSPH.
RSPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOC and RSPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer