EDOC vs. RSPH
EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and RSPH (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - EDOC tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net while RSPH tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOC returned -12.95%/yr vs 3.15%/yr for RSPH. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPH.
Performance
EDOC vs. RSPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than RSPH's 10.63% return.
EDOC
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 1Y
- -10.31%
- 3Y*
- -6.93%
- 5Y*
- -12.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.16%
RSPH
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 6.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $260.96K | $227.88K | $213.27K | |
| $2.19M | $3.44M | $4.84M |
EDOC vs. RSPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -5.19% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | 10.63% | 9.52% | -0.94% | 3.95% | -9.40% | 23.19% | 8.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOC and RSPH is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between EDOC and RSPH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOC vs. RSPH — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC
RSPH
EDOC vs. RSPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOC | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.30 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 2.48 | -2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | 6.31 | -6.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOC vs. RSPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than RSPH's maximum drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and RSPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -40.49% | -25.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -10.87% | -19.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.56% | -17.13% | -17.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.14% | -21.95% | -37.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.07% | -0.26% | -58.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -6.11% | -37.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.90% | 4.27% | +12.63% |
Volatility
EDOC vs. RSPH - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) at 5.44%. This indicates that EDOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 5.44% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 12.03% | +5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 16.00% | +6.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.67% | 16.56% | +10.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 17.80% | +8.47% |
EDOC vs. RSPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPH's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOC vs. RSPH - Dividend Comparison
EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than RSPH's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | 0.66% | 0.70% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.64% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.54% | 0.53% | 0.47% | 0.48% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOC and RSPH have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDOC has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to RSPH (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs RSPH's -40.49%.
On 5-year performance, RSPH leads with 3.15% vs -12.95% for EDOC. On fees, RSPH is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPH has been the lower-risk option at 5.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RSPH has performed better with a 3.15% return vs -12.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPH is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for EDOC.
RSPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.26% for EDOC.
EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while RSPH tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 0.40% for RSPH.
RSPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOC and RSPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer