PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDOC vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EDOC vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EDOC vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EDOC
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF
-18.45%-0.62%-2.87%-11.38%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
4.90%49.85%30.98%19.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -18.45% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 4.90% return.


EDOC

1D
2.83%
1M
-10.48%
YTD
-18.45%
6M
-25.27%
1Y
-15.69%
3Y*
-12.07%
5Y*
-16.45%
10Y*

CHAT

1D
4.72%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
4.90%
6M
3.42%
1Y
82.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EDOC vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EDOC vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOC
EDOC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOC vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDOCCHATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.64

2.42

-3.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.81

3.04

-3.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.42

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

4.94

-5.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.38

13.74

-15.13

EDOC vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOC Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOC and CHAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDOCCHATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

2.42

-3.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

1.27

-1.69

Correlation

The correlation between EDOC and CHAT is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EDOC vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than CHAT's 2.72% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
EDOC
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF
0.40%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
2.72%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EDOC vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and CHAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EDOCCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.76%

-31.34%

-34.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.71%

-16.28%

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.79%

-6.73%

-58.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.40%

-5.61%

-36.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.89%

5.85%

+5.04%

Volatility

EDOC vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) is 7.53%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 13.21%. This indicates that EDOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EDOCCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

13.21%

-5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.50%

23.24%

-6.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.65%

34.27%

-9.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.35%

29.27%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.33%

29.27%

-2.94%