EDOC.L vs. BOTG.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (EDOC.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L).

EDOC.L and BOTG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDOC.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Dec 18, 2020. BOTG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 16, 2021. Both EDOC.L and BOTG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EDOC.L vs. BOTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (EDOC.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EDOC.L vs. BOTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EDOC.L Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD	-12.32%	9.53%	-3.40%	-12.13%	-29.43%	-6.16%
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	-5.93%	13.42%	13.06%	39.60%	-42.85%	-6.14%

Different Trading Currencies

EDOC.L is traded in USD, while BOTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BOTG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOC.L achieves a -12.32% return, which is significantly lower than BOTG.L's -5.93% return.

EDOC.L

• 1D: 3.12%
• 1M: -6.08%
• YTD: -12.32%
• 6M: -18.14%
• 1Y: 1.07%
• 3Y*: -6.64%
• 5Y*: -13.41%
• 10Y*: —

BOTG.L

• 1D: 4.68%
• 1M: -9.58%
• YTD: -5.93%
• 6M: -2.86%
• 1Y: 20.69%
• 3Y*: 11.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOC.L vs. BOTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOC.L has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

EDOC.L

Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD

BOTG.L

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing

Return for Risk

EDOC.L vs. BOTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOC.L

EDOC.L Risk / Return Rank: 12
EDOC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
EDOC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
EDOC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 12
EDOC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
EDOC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

BOTG.L

BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOC.L vs. BOTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (EDOC.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDOC.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.05	0.57	-0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.23	1.05	-0.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.15	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	1.09	-1.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.10	3.54	-3.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDOC.L vs. BOTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOC.L and BOTG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDOC.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05	0.57	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.49	-0.08	-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between EDOC.L and BOTG.L is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EDOC.L vs. BOTG.L - Dividend Comparison

EDOC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EDOC.L Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.26%	0.27%	0.24%	0.08%

Drawdowns

EDOC.L vs. BOTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOC.L drawdown since its inception was -64.69%, which is greater than BOTG.L's maximum drawdown of -53.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC.L and BOTG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDOC.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.69%	-43.70%	-20.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.06%	-17.19%	-5.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.22%	-11.75%	-46.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.78%	-19.84%	-24.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.05%	5.84%	+2.21%

Volatility

EDOC.L vs. BOTG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (EDOC.L) is 6.86%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) has a volatility of 9.33%. This indicates that EDOC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDOC.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.86%	9.33%	-2.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.00%	17.37%	-2.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.85%	36.35%	-13.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.51%	29.84%	-2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.64%	29.84%	-2.20%