EDOC.L vs. AQWG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (EDOC.L) and Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AQWG.L).
EDOC.L and AQWG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDOC.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Dec 18, 2020. AQWG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water TR. It was launched on Dec 7, 2021. Both EDOC.L and AQWG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EDOC.L vs. AQWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EDOC.L vs. AQWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC.L Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD | -12.32% | 9.53% | -3.40% | -12.13% | -29.43% | -0.37% |
AQWG.L Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF | 1.11% | 13.10% | 5.99% | 24.49% | -19.63% | -0.11% |
Different Trading Currencies
EDOC.L is traded in USD, while AQWG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the AQWG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOC.L achieves a -12.32% return, which is significantly lower than AQWG.L's 1.11% return.
EDOC.L
- 1D
- 3.12%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- -12.32%
- 6M
- -18.14%
- 1Y
- 1.07%
- 3Y*
- -6.64%
- 5Y*
- -13.41%
- 10Y*
- —
AQWG.L
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- 1Y
- 13.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDOC.L vs. AQWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOC.L has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than AQWG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EDOC.L vs. AQWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC.L
AQWG.L
EDOC.L vs. AQWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (EDOC.L) and Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AQWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDOC.L | AQWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.05 | 0.82 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.23 | 1.21 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.16 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 1.14 | -1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.10 | 3.58 | -3.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDOC.L | AQWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 0.82 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | 0.26 | -0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOC.L and AQWG.L is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EDOC.L vs. AQWG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDOC.L nor AQWG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EDOC.L vs. AQWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC.L drawdown since its inception was -64.69%, which is greater than AQWG.L's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC.L and AQWG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC.L | AQWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.69% | -23.03% | -41.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.06% | -9.85% | -13.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.22% | -6.75% | -51.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.78% | -7.34% | -37.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.05% | 3.18% | +4.87% |
Volatility
EDOC.L vs. AQWG.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (EDOC.L) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AQWG.L) at 5.58%. This indicates that EDOC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC.L | AQWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 5.58% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.00% | 9.88% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.85% | 16.14% | +6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.51% | 17.21% | +10.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 17.21% | +10.43% |