PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIV vs. USFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDIV vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 9.37%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.


EDIV

1D
0.31%
1M
1.60%
YTD
7.52%
6M
8.10%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
9.37%

USFR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.89%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
2.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
7.52%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
1.78%4.23%5.47%5.18%1.98%-0.03%0.56%2.02%2.01%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and USFR is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014

-0.00

The correlation between EDIV and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDIV vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDIVUSFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-47.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

13.24

-12.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

200.29

-198.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.77

775.73

-770.96

EDIV vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 14.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and USFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDIVUSFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-1.36%

-52.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-0.02%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-0.06%

-13.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-0.18%

-28.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-0.80%

-39.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

0.00%

-3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.31%

-0.15%

-19.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

0.01%

+3.44%

Volatility

EDIV vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.08%. This indicates that EDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDIVUSFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

0.08%

+4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.63%

0.19%

+10.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

0.27%

+12.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

0.40%

+13.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

0.78%

+16.69%

EDIV vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDIV vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than USFR's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
5.77%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
3.91%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDIV and USFR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIV has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to USFR (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs USFR's -1.36%.

On 10-year performance, EDIV leads with 9.37% vs 2.43% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 9.37% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 3.91% for USFR.

EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.15% for USFR.

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDIV and USFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer