PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIV vs. THQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDIV vs. THQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly higher than THQ's -2.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EDIV having a 9.16% annualized return and THQ not far ahead at 9.19%.


EDIV

1D
-1.27%
1M
2.48%
YTD
6.42%
6M
7.80%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
9.16%

THQ

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
-2.61%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
9.04%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV vs. THQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
6.42%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%
THQ
Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
-2.61%13.88%15.51%-1.62%-17.53%33.39%15.20%22.70%3.41%21.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and THQ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2014

0.39

The correlation between EDIV and THQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDIV vs. THQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

THQ
THQ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
THQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
THQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
THQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
THQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV vs. THQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDIVTHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.10

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

0.53

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.23

1.44

+2.79

EDIV vs. THQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the THQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and THQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDIVTHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

0.50

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.18

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.45

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.36

-0.19

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. THQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than THQ's maximum drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and THQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDIVTHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-39.35%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-17.25%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-25.86%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-32.20%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-39.35%

-1.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.07%

-7.82%

+3.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.36%

-8.63%

-10.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

6.29%

-2.95%

Volatility

EDIV vs. THQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 4.11%, while Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDIVTHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

5.15%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

12.84%

-2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

18.24%

-6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

19.03%

-5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

20.47%

-2.98%

EDIV vs. THQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than THQ's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDIV vs. THQ - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than THQ's 12.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.50%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
THQ
Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
12.17%11.29%11.09%7.45%6.81%5.27%6.62%7.08%8.05%7.71%8.70%9.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDIV and THQ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THQ has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to EDIV (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs THQ's -39.35%.

EDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDIV and THQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer