PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIV vs. SEMA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EDIV vs. SEMA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EDIV vs. SEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
1.86%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
4.82%34.53%7.56%8.93%-20.28%-2.49%18.20%17.14%-14.38%36.27%
Different Trading Currencies

EDIV is traded in USD, while SEMA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SEMA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than SEMA.L's 4.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EDIV having a 8.40% annualized return and SEMA.L not far behind at 8.16%.


EDIV

1D
0.20%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
1.86%
6M
3.56%
1Y
15.65%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
8.40%

SEMA.L

1D
4.03%
1M
-6.25%
YTD
4.82%
6M
8.93%
1Y
34.90%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
8.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EDIV vs. SEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SEMA.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EDIV vs. SEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SEMA.L
SEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV vs. SEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDIVSEMA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

1.83

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

2.36

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.68

-1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.68

10.01

-4.32

EDIV vs. SEMA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and SEMA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDIVSEMA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.83

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.24

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.43

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.26

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and SEMA.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EDIV vs. SEMA.L - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, while SEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.70%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. SEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than SEMA.L's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and SEMA.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EDIVSEMA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-31.75%

-21.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-10.95%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-23.52%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-27.06%

-13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.17%

-7.55%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.53%

-10.81%

-8.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.09%

-0.22%

Volatility

EDIV vs. SEMA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 5.79%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) has a volatility of 8.20%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EDIVSEMA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

8.20%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

14.00%

-4.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

18.99%

-5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.81%

18.24%

-4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

19.38%

-1.80%