PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIV vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDIV vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.


EDIV

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.49%
6M
2.77%
YTD
7.94%
1Y
13.69%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
8.24%
ALL TIME*
3.13%

SBIT

1D
5.60%
1M
-6.04%
6M
32.41%
YTD
39.44%
1Y
98.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-42.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.15M$4.91M$5.47M
$29.57M$32.71M$46.48M

EDIV vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
7.94%16.45%9.24%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
39.44%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and SBIT is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.31

The correlation between EDIV and SBIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.41 (1 year) to -0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDIV vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDIV vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDIVSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.23

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

2.35

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.93

5.19

-1.25

EDIV vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDIVSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-91.35%

+37.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-47.94%

+37.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-77.87%

+75.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.19%

-69.07%

+49.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

21.67%

-18.13%

Volatility

EDIV vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 4.22%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDIVSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

18.09%

-13.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

67.10%

-55.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

88.65%

-75.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

96.10%

-82.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

96.10%

-78.79%

EDIV vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDIV vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than SBIT's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.21%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
4.03%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDIV and SBIT have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to EDIV (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 13.69% for EDIV. On fees, EDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 13.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 4.03% for SBIT.

EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDIV and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer