EDIV vs. GLD
EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - EDIV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDIV returned 9.16%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for GLD. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
EDIV vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 9.16%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.
EDIV
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 14.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
EDIV vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 6.42% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 11.21% | -9.95% | 11.80% | -6.16% | 28.20% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDIV and GLD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2011 | 0.20 |
The correlation between EDIV and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EDIV vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDIV
GLD
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
EDIV
GLD
-
Communication Services
EDIV
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
EDIV
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
EDIV
GLD
-
Industrials
EDIV
GLD
-
Technology
EDIV
GLD
-
Real Estate
EDIV
GLD
-
Energy
EDIV
GLD
-
Utilities
EDIV
GLD
-
Basic Materials
EDIV
GLD
Healthcare
EDIV
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDIV vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
EDIV
GLD
EDIV vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDIV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 1.68 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.23 | 4.15 | +0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDIV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 1.01 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.83 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.60 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
EDIV vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDIV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.36% | -45.56% | -7.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -19.21% | +8.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -19.21% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -21.03% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.76% | -22.00% | -18.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.07% | -17.75% | +13.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -16.16% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 7.73% | -4.39% |
Volatility
EDIV vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 4.11%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDIV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 5.51% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 23.16% | -13.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 26.61% | -14.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 18.00% | -4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 15.95% | +1.54% |
EDIV vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDIV vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.50% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDIV and GLD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to EDIV (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 9.16% for EDIV. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.
EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GLD is Gold. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.40% for GLD.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDIV and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer