EDIV vs. FZAEX
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX).
EDIV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2011. FZAEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013.
Performance
EDIV vs. FZAEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EDIV vs. FZAEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 1.86% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 11.21% | -9.95% | 11.80% | -6.16% | 28.20% |
FZAEX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z | 4.43% | 40.25% | 9.43% | 8.60% | -19.75% | -2.50% | 30.63% | 29.94% | -17.95% | 46.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than FZAEX's 4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has underperformed FZAEX with an annualized return of 8.40%, while FZAEX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.89% annualized return.
EDIV
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- 15.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
FZAEX
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -8.80%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 36.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDIV vs. FZAEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FZAEX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EDIV vs. FZAEX — Risk / Return Rank
EDIV
FZAEX
EDIV vs. FZAEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDIV | FZAEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 2.05 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 2.58 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.40 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.69 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.68 | 10.21 | -4.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDIV | FZAEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 2.05 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.29 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.59 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.49 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between EDIV and FZAEX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EDIV vs. FZAEX - Dividend Comparison
EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than FZAEX's 1.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.70% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
FZAEX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z | 1.58% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 1.69% | 1.23% | 5.35% | 2.23% | 11.13% | 0.78% | 0.10% | 0.63% | 0.34% |
Drawdowns
EDIV vs. FZAEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than FZAEX's maximum drawdown of -41.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and FZAEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDIV | FZAEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.36% | -41.73% | -11.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -13.71% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -40.39% | +12.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.76% | -41.73% | +0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.17% | -10.73% | +2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.53% | -12.53% | -7.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 3.60% | -0.73% |
Volatility
EDIV vs. FZAEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 5.79%, while Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) has a volatility of 9.38%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZAEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EDIV | FZAEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 9.38% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 13.47% | -4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.76% | 18.66% | -4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 18.52% | -4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 18.58% | -1.00% |