EDGX vs. COSW
EDGX (Global X U.S. 500 Income Edge ETF) and COSW (Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. EDGX is passively managed, while COSW is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
EDGX vs. COSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDGX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COSW
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDGX vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EDGX Global X U.S. 500 Income Edge ETF | 10.16% |
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | -5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGX and COSW is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGX vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 Income Edge ETF (EDGX) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDGX | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.05 | 0.01 | +3.04 |
Drawdowns
EDGX vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDGX drawdown since its inception was -7.56%, smaller than the maximum COSW drawdown of -16.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGX and COSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGX | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -16.24% | +8.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -14.62% | +14.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -4.17% | +2.67% |
Volatility
EDGX vs. COSW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGX | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 26.10% | -13.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.10% | 26.10% | -13.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.10% | 26.10% | -13.00% |
Dividends
EDGX vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison
EDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than COSW's 18.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 18.13% | 4.96% |
EDGX Global X U.S. 500 Income Edge ETF | 2.43% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDGX and COSW have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COSW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 2.43% for EDGX.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill.
Find the right allocation for EDGX and COSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer