EDGQ vs. SIL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDGQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. EDGQ is actively managed, while SIL is passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDGQ charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.

Performance

EDGQ vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EDGQ

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 7.69%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIL

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 2.48%
• YTD: 5.99%
• 6M: 17.42%
• 1Y: 90.97%
• 3Y*: 49.60%
• 5Y*: 14.23%
• 10Y*: 10.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGQ vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF	19.41%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	-11.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGQ and SIL is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.57

Return for Risk

EDGQ vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 50
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGQ vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDGQ	SIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.23	0.14	+5.09

Drawdowns

EDGQ vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and SIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDGQ	SIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-82.99%	+75.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-32.91%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.91%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-25.00%	+24.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.28%	-51.44%	+50.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.91%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EDGQ	SIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	41.56%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.97%	50.02%	-34.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.97%	39.21%	-23.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.97%	39.60%	-23.63%

EDGQ vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDGQ vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than SIL's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF	3.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.12%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDGQ and SIL in my portfolio?

EDGQ and SIL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EDGQ or SIL?

On fees, EDGQ is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDGQ or SIL?

EDGQ is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDGQ or SIL?

EDGQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 1.12% for SIL.

What is the main difference between EDGQ and SIL?

EDGQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while SIL is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 0.65% for SIL.