PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGQ vs. QLDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGQ vs. QLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EDGQ

1D
-1.17%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLDY

1D
-1.77%
1M
-4.25%
YTD
13.56%
6M
13.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGQ vs. QLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EDGQ and QLDY is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGQ vs. QLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EDGQ vs. QLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDGQ vs. QLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum QLDY drawdown of -17.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and QLDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGQQLDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-17.44%

+9.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-4.77%

+2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-4.26%

+2.62%

Volatility

EDGQ vs. QLDY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGQQLDYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.79%

21.58%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

21.58%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.79%

21.58%

-1.79%

EDGQ vs. QLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than QLDY's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGQ vs. QLDY - Dividend Comparison

EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than QLDY's 25.42% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, EDGQ and QLDY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EDGQ is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDGQ is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.

QLDY has the higher dividend yield at 25.42%, compared with 4.45% for EDGQ.

EDGQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while QLDY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 1.04% for QLDY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGQ and QLDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer