EDGI vs. MCSE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EDGI (3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF) and MCSE (Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EDGI returned 22.76% vs 4.30% for MCSE. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EDGI charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCSE.

Performance

EDGI vs. MCSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF (EDGI) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGI achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than MCSE's 1.12% return.

EDGI

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -0.10%
• 6M: 4.01%
• YTD: 9.43%
• 1Y: 22.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.84%

MCSE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.12%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: 0.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EDGI 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF	$817.52K	$2.19M	$1.06M
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

EDGI vs. MCSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EDGI 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF	9.43%	26.77%	-7.13%
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	1.12%	7.79%	-12.53%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGI and MCSE is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	0.58

The correlation between EDGI and MCSE shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDGI vs. MCSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDGI	MCSE
Technology	20.4%	31.1%
Industrials	19.9%	18.1%
Financial Services	19.4%	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	13.8%
Healthcare	6.2%	20.1%
Basic Materials	6.1%	5.1%
Communication Services	5.5%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	5.0%
Energy	2.8%	-
Real Estate	2.5%	-
Utilities	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

EDGI vs. MCSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDGI

EDGI Risk / Return Rank: 49
EDGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EDGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
EDGI Omega Ratio Rank: 51
EDGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
EDGI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

MCSE

MCSE Risk / Return Rank: 20
MCSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MCSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
MCSE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MCSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
MCSE Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDGI vs. MCSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF (EDGI) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDGI	MCSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	0.46	+0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	0.70	+1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.12	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	0.45	+1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.11	1.13	+4.97

EDGI vs. MCSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGI Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the MCSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGI and MCSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EDGI vs. MCSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGI drawdown since its inception was -14.52%, smaller than the maximum MCSE drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGI and MCSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDGI	MCSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.52%	-26.36%	+11.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.84%	-10.42%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-10.51%	+8.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-8.80%	+5.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	4.37%	-0.63%

Volatility

EDGI vs. MCSE - Volatility Comparison

3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF (EDGI) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that EDGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDGI	MCSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	0.00%	+5.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.81%	1.87%	+12.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.74%	10.29%	+6.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	19.07%	-2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	19.07%	-2.48%

EDGI vs. MCSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGI has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than MCSE's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDGI vs. MCSE - Dividend Comparison

EDGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than MCSE's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EDGI 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF	1.38%	1.97%	0.61%	0.00%	0.00%
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	3.74%	3.78%	0.63%	0.57%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDGI and MCSE in my portfolio?

EDGI and MCSE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDGI or MCSE?

EDGI has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGI dropped -14.52% vs MCSE's -26.36%.

Which ETF is better, EDGI or MCSE?

On 1-year performance, EDGI leads with 22.76% vs 4.30% for MCSE. On fees, MCSE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDGI or MCSE?

Over the 1-year period, EDGI has performed better with a 22.76% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDGI or MCSE?

MCSE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for EDGI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDGI or MCSE?

MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 1.38% for EDGI.

What is the main difference between EDGI and MCSE?

They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for EDGI and 0.59% for MCSE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.