PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGF vs. VTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGF vs. VTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGF achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than VTG's -0.10% return.


EDGF

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.06%
6M
0.93%
YTD
1.01%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTG

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-0.27%
YTD
-0.10%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGF vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EDGF
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
1.01%2.02%
VTG
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
-0.10%3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGF and VTG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.63

The correlation between EDGF and VTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGF vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGF
EDGF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EDGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VTG
VTG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
VTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGF vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDGFVTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.17

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

1.14

+3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.83

2.94

+8.89

EDGF vs. VTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the VTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGF and VTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDGF vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGF drawdown since its inception was -1.62%, smaller than the maximum VTG drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGF and VTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGFVTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.62%

-2.89%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.64%

-2.89%

+2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.88%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

-0.84%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

1.12%

-0.87%

Volatility

EDGF vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) is 0.44%, while Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that EDGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGFVTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

1.05%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.21%

2.65%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

3.52%

-1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.30%

3.52%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.30%

3.52%

-1.22%

EDGF vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGF vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison

EDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than VTG's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EDGF
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
3.22%3.61%0.49%
VTG
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
3.54%1.65%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGF and VTG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTG has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to EDGF (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGF dropped -1.62% vs VTG's -2.89%.

On 1-year performance, VTG leads with 3.29% vs 2.92% for EDGF. On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EDGF has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VTG has performed better with a 3.29% return vs 2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for EDGF.

VTG has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 3.22% for EDGF.

EDGF is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while VTG is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for EDGF and 0.03% for VTG.

EDGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGF and VTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer