EDGF vs. BBAG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EDGF (3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) and BBAG (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. EDGF is actively managed, while BBAG is passively managed. Over the past year, EDGF returned 3.57% vs 5.12% for BBAG. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDGF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BBAG.

Performance

EDGF vs. BBAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGF achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than BBAG's 0.17% return.

EDGF

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 3.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBAG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.02%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 3.86%
• 5Y*: -0.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGF vs. BBAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	0.90%	4.36%	-1.41%
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.17%	7.27%	-2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGF and BBAG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024	0.74

The correlation between EDGF and BBAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDGF vs. BBAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDGF	BBAG
Financial Services	99.2%	6.5%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Communication Services	-	46.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.0%
Energy	-	1.2%
Healthcare	-	2.6%
Industrials	-	1.6%
Real Estate	-	6.8%
Technology	-	12.0%
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

EDGF vs. BBAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGF

EDGF Risk / Return Rank: 69
EDGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
EDGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
EDGF Omega Ratio Rank: 62
EDGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EDGF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

BBAG

BBAG Risk / Return Rank: 37
BBAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BBAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
BBAG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BBAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BBAG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGF vs. BBAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDGF	BBAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.31	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	1.96	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.23	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.57	1.85	+3.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.29	5.54	+8.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDGF vs. BBAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the BBAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGF and BBAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDGF	BBAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	1.31	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	0.32	+0.66

Drawdowns

EDGF vs. BBAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGF drawdown since its inception was -1.62%, smaller than the maximum BBAG drawdown of -18.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGF and BBAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDGF	BBAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.62%	-18.73%	+17.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.64%	-2.78%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-2.84%	+2.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.46%	-6.22%	+5.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.25%	0.93%	-0.68%

Volatility

EDGF vs. BBAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) is 0.28%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that EDGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDGF	BBAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.28%	1.24%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.26%	2.82%	-1.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94%	3.92%	-1.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.35%	5.93%	-3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.35%	5.80%	-3.45%

EDGF vs. BBAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAG's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDGF vs. BBAG - Dividend Comparison

EDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than BBAG's 4.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.37%	4.29%	4.25%	3.60%	2.23%	1.44%	2.26%	2.92%	0.16%
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	3.45%	3.61%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDGF and BBAG in my portfolio?

EDGF and BBAG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDGF or BBAG?

BBAG has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to EDGF (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGF dropped -1.62% vs BBAG's -18.73%.

Which ETF is better, EDGF or BBAG?

On 1-year performance, BBAG leads with 5.12% vs 3.57% for EDGF. On fees, BBAG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EDGF has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDGF or BBAG?

Over the 1-year period, BBAG has performed better with a 5.12% return vs 3.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDGF or BBAG?

BBAG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for EDGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDGF or BBAG?

BBAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 3.45% for EDGF.

What is the main difference between EDGF and BBAG?

They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for EDGF and 0.03% for BBAG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.