PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGE vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGE vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGE achieves a 13.32% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 8.89% return.


EDGE

1D
1.06%
1M
3.57%
6M
11.92%
YTD
13.32%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.49%

XYLD

1D
0.24%
1M
2.61%
6M
7.72%
YTD
8.89%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
12.21%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
8.30%
ALL TIME*
8.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.14K$142.84K$123.15K
$31.68M$34.09M$32.56M

EDGE vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EDGE
MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF
13.32%12.94%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
8.89%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGE and XYLD is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025

0.90

The correlation between EDGE and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGE vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDGE
EDGE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDGE vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDGEXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.60

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.54

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

18.41

-3.96

EDGE vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGE Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGE and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDGE vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGE drawdown since its inception was -20.66%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGE and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGEXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-33.46%

+12.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-5.29%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-3.67%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.02%

+0.77%

Volatility

EDGE vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.93%. This indicates that EDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGEXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

1.93%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

5.98%

+4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

7.09%

+5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

11.27%

+4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

14.16%

+1.72%

EDGE vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGE vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

EDGE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDGE
MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.45%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, EDGE and XYLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EDGE has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to XYLD (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGE dropped -20.66% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 1-year performance, EDGE leads with 25.77% vs 18.65% for XYLD. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EDGE has performed better with a 25.77% return vs 18.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EDGE.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.45%, compared with 0.00% for EDGE.

They also come from different issuers: MRBL and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EDGE and 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGE and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer