PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGE vs. XRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGE vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGE achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 1.66% return.


EDGE

1D
-1.30%
1M
0.06%
YTD
7.77%
6M
7.50%
1Y
25.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XRMI

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.20%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGE vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EDGE
MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF
7.77%12.94%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
1.66%2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGE and XRMI is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025

0.71

The correlation between EDGE and XRMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGE vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGE
EDGE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGE vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDGEXRMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

1.81

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

7.28

+7.37

EDGE vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGE Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGE and XRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDGE vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGE drawdown since its inception was -20.66%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGE and XRMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGEXRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-15.31%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-5.02%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-0.52%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-5.87%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

1.24%

+0.49%

Volatility

EDGE vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 1.71%. This indicates that EDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGEXRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

1.71%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

4.44%

+5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

5.52%

+6.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

6.91%

+9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.07%

6.91%

+9.16%

EDGE vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGE vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

EDGE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EDGE
MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.73%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGE and XRMI have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDGE has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to XRMI (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGE dropped -20.66% vs XRMI's -15.31%.

On 1-year performance, EDGE leads with 25.34% vs 9.03% for XRMI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EDGE has performed better with a 25.34% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EDGE.

XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.73%, compared with 0.00% for EDGE.

They also come from different issuers: MRBL and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EDGE and 0.60% for XRMI.

EDGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGE and XRMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer