PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGE vs. HYGW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGE vs. HYGW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGE achieves a 13.32% return, which is significantly higher than HYGW's 2.94% return.


EDGE

1D
1.06%
1M
3.57%
6M
11.92%
YTD
13.32%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.49%

HYGW

1D
0.25%
1M
0.60%
6M
2.29%
YTD
2.94%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
5.58%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.14K$142.84K$123.15K
$522.43K$620.74K$795.59K

EDGE vs. HYGW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EDGE and HYGW is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025

0.58

The correlation between EDGE and HYGW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGE vs. HYGW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDGE
EDGE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGW
HYGW Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HYGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGW Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGW Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDGE vs. HYGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDGEHYGWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.48

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

15.53

-1.08

EDGE vs. HYGW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGE Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the HYGW Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGE and HYGW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDGE vs. HYGW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGE drawdown since its inception was -20.66%, which is greater than HYGW's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGE and HYGW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGEHYGWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-5.49%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-1.82%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-0.59%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

0.41%

+1.38%

Volatility

EDGE vs. HYGW - Volatility Comparison

MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) at 0.88%. This indicates that EDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGEHYGWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

0.88%

+3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

2.35%

+8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

2.94%

+9.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

4.61%

+11.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

4.61%

+11.27%

EDGE vs. HYGW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGW's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGE vs. HYGW - Dividend Comparison

EDGE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.35%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EDGE
MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYGW
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
10.35%12.53%12.30%15.98%8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGE and HYGW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDGE has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to HYGW (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGE dropped -20.66% vs HYGW's -5.49%.

On 1-year performance, EDGE leads with 25.77% vs 6.30% for HYGW. On fees, HYGW is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, HYGW has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EDGE has performed better with a 25.77% return vs 6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYGW is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EDGE.

HYGW has the higher dividend yield at 10.35%, compared with 0.00% for EDGE.

They also come from different issuers: MRBL and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EDGE and 0.69% for HYGW.

HYGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGE and HYGW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer