EDG2.L vs. PRAM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EDG2.L (iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and PRAM.L (Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from iShares and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EDG2.L returned 20.29%/yr vs 20.13%/yr for PRAM.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDG2.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PRAM.L.

Performance

EDG2.L vs. PRAM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) and Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EDG2.L is traded in GBP, while PRAM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRAM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EDG2.L having a 25.10% return and PRAM.L slightly lower at 24.77%.

EDG2.L

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: 6.61%
• YTD: 25.10%
• 6M: 26.84%
• 1Y: 51.62%
• 3Y*: 20.29%
• 5Y*: 7.75%
• 10Y*: —

PRAM.L

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: 5.71%
• YTD: 24.77%
• 6M: 26.35%
• 1Y: 51.29%
• 3Y*: 20.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDG2.L vs. PRAM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EDG2.L iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	25.10%	26.14%	8.61%	2.17%	-12.40%	0.19%
PRAM.L Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)	24.77%	23.16%	9.01%	3.99%	-8.64%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EDG2.L and PRAM.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021	0.69

Over the past year, EDG2.L and PRAM.L have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.69, meaning their price movements have been converging.

EDG2.L vs. PRAM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDG2.L	PRAM.L
Technology	43.1%	40.7%
Financial Services	17.9%	17.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	9.1%
Industrials	7.0%	8.3%
Communication Services	6.3%	6.1%
Basic Materials	5.5%	5.8%
Energy	3.4%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	2.8%
Healthcare	2.6%	2.8%
Utilities	1.7%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.3%	1.1%

Return for Risk

EDG2.L vs. PRAM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDG2.L

EDG2.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
EDG2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
EDG2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
EDG2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
EDG2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EDG2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

PRAM.L

PRAM.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
PRAM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PRAM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PRAM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PRAM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
PRAM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDG2.L vs. PRAM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) and Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDG2.L	PRAM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	2.84	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	3.64	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.52	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.54	4.98	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.95	16.58	-0.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDG2.L vs. PRAM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDG2.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the PRAM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDG2.L and PRAM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDG2.L	PRAM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.00	2.84	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.82	-0.30

Drawdowns

EDG2.L vs. PRAM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDG2.L drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, which is greater than PRAM.L's maximum drawdown of -15.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDG2.L and PRAM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDG2.L	PRAM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.22%	-15.77%	-12.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.31%	-10.26%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.35%	-15.77%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-2.78%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.12%	-4.79%	-7.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	3.08%	+0.15%

Volatility

EDG2.L vs. PRAM.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) and Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) have volatilities of 7.51% and 7.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDG2.L	PRAM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.51%	7.80%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.69%	15.43%	-0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.13%	18.02%	-0.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.14%	18.89%	-2.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.91%	18.89%	-0.98%

EDG2.L vs. PRAM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDG2.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAM.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EDG2.L vs. PRAM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EDG2.L nor PRAM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDG2.L and PRAM.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, EDG2.L and PRAM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EDG2.L or PRAM.L?

On fees, PRAM.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDG2.L or PRAM.L?

PRAM.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EDG2.L.

What is the main difference between EDG2.L and PRAM.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EDG2.L and 0.10% for PRAM.L.