EDF vs. PACEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX).
EDF is an actively managed fund by Virtus. It was launched on Dec 23, 2010. PACEX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on May 23, 2012.
Performance
EDF vs. PACEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EDF vs. PACEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund | -0.34% | 22.24% | 25.54% | 21.63% | -27.96% | -8.47% | -31.14% | 45.06% | -18.24% | 24.22% |
PACEX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | -1.68% | 8.38% | 6.64% | 6.38% | -13.41% | -2.01% | 6.59% | 12.82% | -1.80% | 8.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDF achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly higher than PACEX's -1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EDF has outperformed PACEX with an annualized return of 4.75%, while PACEX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.41% annualized return.
EDF
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -5.17%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- 4.75%
PACEX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.75%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDF vs. PACEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDF has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PACEX's 1.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EDF vs. PACEX — Risk / Return Rank
EDF
PACEX
EDF vs. PACEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDF | PACEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 1.47 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 2.02 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.36 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 1.40 | -0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | 5.25 | -2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDF | PACEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 1.47 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.22 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.84 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.94 | -0.85 |
Correlation
The correlation between EDF and PACEX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EDF vs. PACEX - Dividend Comparison
EDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.06%, more than PACEX's 5.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund | 15.06% | 14.49% | 15.32% | 16.71% | 17.31% | 12.91% | 16.46% | 15.67% | 19.37% | 13.58% | 14.75% | 17.93% |
PACEX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 5.19% | 5.50% | 4.76% | 3.86% | 3.06% | 3.36% | 3.85% | 4.26% | 4.46% | 3.94% | 4.27% | 4.92% |
Drawdowns
EDF vs. PACEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDF drawdown since its inception was -64.23%, which is greater than PACEX's maximum drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDF and PACEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDF | PACEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.23% | -23.40% | -40.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.17% | -3.35% | -10.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.09% | -23.40% | -29.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.23% | -23.40% | -40.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.26% | -3.07% | -15.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.61% | -4.20% | -17.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 0.89% | +2.51% |
Volatility
EDF vs. PACEX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) at 0.88%. This indicates that EDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PACEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EDF | PACEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 0.88% | +4.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 1.86% | +8.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 3.20% | +14.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.87% | 3.44% | +22.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.66% | 4.06% | +26.60% |