EDF vs. EDD
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD).
EDF is an actively managed fund by Virtus. It was launched on Dec 23, 2010. EDD is managed by Morgan Stanley. It was launched on Apr 24, 2007.
Performance
EDF vs. EDD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EDF vs. EDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund | -0.34% | 22.24% | 25.54% | 21.63% | -27.96% | -8.47% | -31.14% | 45.06% | -18.24% | 24.22% |
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | -3.98% | 32.46% | 8.64% | 14.09% | -14.15% | -7.03% | -2.84% | 25.45% | -14.09% | 16.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDF achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly higher than EDD's -3.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EDF has outperformed EDD with an annualized return of 4.75%, while EDD has yielded a comparatively lower 4.43% annualized return.
EDF
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -5.17%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- 4.75%
EDD
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -14.39%
- YTD
- -3.98%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- 1Y
- 18.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDF vs. EDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDF has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EDD's 2.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EDF vs. EDD — Risk / Return Rank
EDF
EDD
EDF vs. EDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDF | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 1.12 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 1.56 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.21 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 1.10 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | 4.79 | -1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDF | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 1.12 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.35 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.25 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between EDF and EDD is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EDF vs. EDD - Dividend Comparison
EDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.06%, more than EDD's 10.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund | 15.06% | 14.49% | 15.32% | 16.71% | 17.31% | 12.91% | 16.46% | 15.67% | 19.37% | 13.58% | 14.75% | 17.93% |
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 10.06% | 9.76% | 11.45% | 7.30% | 6.82% | 6.93% | 6.92% | 8.15% | 9.90% | 8.18% | 10.32% | 12.65% |
Drawdowns
EDF vs. EDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDF drawdown since its inception was -64.23%, which is greater than EDD's maximum drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDF and EDD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDF | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.23% | -59.38% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.17% | -17.67% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.09% | -32.04% | -21.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.23% | -42.70% | -21.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.26% | -15.50% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.61% | -24.38% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 4.05% | -0.65% |
Volatility
EDF vs. EDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) is 5.67%, while Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a volatility of 8.07%. This indicates that EDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EDF | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 8.07% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 11.58% | -1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 16.87% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.87% | 15.07% | +10.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.66% | 17.65% | +13.01% |