EDEN vs. YCS
EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - EDEN is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDEN returned 8.15%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for YCS. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDEN charges 0.53%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
EDEN vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDEN achieves a -3.95% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EDEN has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 8.15%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return.
EDEN
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -3.95%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- -2.97%
- 3Y*
- 2.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.15%
YCS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 35.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 23.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
EDEN vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | -3.95% | 10.58% | -3.94% | 17.99% | -11.47% | 14.81% | 42.56% | 24.37% | -14.43% | 35.39% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 6.99% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDEN and YCS is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2012 | 0.00 |
The correlation between EDEN and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.36 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDEN vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
EDEN
YCS
EDEN vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDEN | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | 2.05 | -2.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | 2.59 | -2.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.37 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 3.95 | -4.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | 12.35 | -12.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDEN | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | 2.05 | -2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 1.10 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.65 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.33 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
EDEN vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDEN drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDEN | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.61% | -49.56% | +12.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.17% | -8.30% | -12.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.31% | -23.05% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.61% | -27.32% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.61% | -27.32% | -9.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.36% | -0.04% | -14.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -19.94% | +12.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.00% | 2.66% | +7.34% |
Volatility
EDEN vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that EDEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDEN | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 2.75% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.59% | 12.36% | +3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.92% | 17.38% | +3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 21.11% | -0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 19.02% | +0.41% |
EDEN vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDEN has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDEN vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
EDEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 2.90% | 2.79% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% | 2.36% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDEN and YCS have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDEN has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDEN dropped -36.61% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.32% vs 8.15% for EDEN. On fees, EDEN is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.32% return vs 8.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDEN is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
EDEN has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
EDEN is categorized as Europe Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDEN and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDEN and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer