EDEN vs. PTTRX
EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) and PTTRX (PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class) are both funds - EDEN is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while PTTRX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, EDEN returned 9.22%/yr vs 2.29%/yr for PTTRX. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDEN charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PTTRX.
Performance
EDEN vs. PTTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDEN achieves a -3.05% return, which is significantly lower than PTTRX's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EDEN has outperformed PTTRX with an annualized return of 9.22%, while PTTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.29% annualized return.
EDEN
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- -3.05%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- -6.97%
- 3Y*
- 2.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
PTTRX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 6.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
EDEN vs. PTTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | -3.05% | 10.58% | -3.94% | 17.99% | -11.47% | 14.81% | 42.56% | 24.37% | -14.43% | 35.39% |
PTTRX PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class | 0.64% | 9.35% | 2.62% | 6.33% | -14.72% | -0.59% | 8.88% | 8.36% | -0.24% | 5.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDEN and PTTRX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2012 | 0.06 |
Over the past year, EDEN and PTTRX have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDEN vs. PTTRX — Risk / Return Rank
EDEN
PTTRX
EDEN vs. PTTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDEN | PTTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.27 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 1.83 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 5.48 | -6.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDEN vs. PTTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDEN drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, which is greater than PTTRX's maximum drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN and PTTRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDEN | PTTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.61% | -19.28% | -17.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.17% | -3.69% | -17.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.31% | -6.18% | -23.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.61% | -19.28% | -17.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.61% | -19.28% | -17.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.55% | -1.49% | -12.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -2.19% | -5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.27% | 1.23% | +9.04% |
Volatility
EDEN vs. PTTRX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX) at 1.77%. This indicates that EDEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDEN | PTTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 1.77% | +3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 3.61% | +12.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.90% | 4.63% | +16.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 6.28% | +13.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 5.23% | +14.18% |
EDEN vs. PTTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDEN has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than PTTRX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDEN vs. PTTRX - Dividend Comparison
EDEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than PTTRX's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 2.87% | 2.79% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% | 2.36% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% |
PTTRX PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class | 4.54% | 4.47% | 4.61% | 3.81% | 3.63% | 2.59% | 6.11% | 3.96% | 3.13% | 2.63% | 3.02% | 6.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDEN and PTTRX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDEN has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to PTTRX (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDEN dropped -36.61% vs PTTRX's -19.28%.
PTTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDEN and PTTRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer