EDEN vs. IBIC
EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDEN is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EDEN returned -0.63% vs 4.42% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. EDEN charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
EDEN vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDEN achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.43% return.
EDEN
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -3.46%
- 6M
- -3.93%
- 1Y
- -0.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDEN vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | -3.46% | 10.58% | -3.94% | 7.82% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.43% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDEN and IBIC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.03 |
The correlation between EDEN and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDEN vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
EDEN
IBIC
EDEN vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDEN | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 2.22 | -1.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 16.56 | -16.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 58.67 | -58.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDEN vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDEN drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDEN | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.61% | -0.90% | -35.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.17% | -0.27% | -20.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.92% | -0.08% | -13.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -0.10% | -7.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.81% | 0.08% | +9.73% |
Volatility
EDEN vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that EDEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDEN | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 0.17% | +4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.73% | 0.67% | +15.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.72% | 0.89% | +19.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 1.56% | +18.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 1.56% | +17.67% |
EDEN vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDEN has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDEN vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
EDEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 3.17% | 2.79% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% | 2.36% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.58% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDEN and IBIC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDEN has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDEN dropped -36.61% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.42% vs -0.63% for EDEN. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.42% return vs -0.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDEN.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 3.17% for EDEN.
EDEN is categorized as Europe Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDEN and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDEN and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer